Preview

Siberian Journal of Philosophy

Advanced search

INSTITUTIONAL RESTRICTIONS OF THE DEMOCRATIC APPROACH TO THE GENESIS OF ELITES

https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2018-16-3-81-88

Abstract

The common problem of the democratic society is the discrepancy between the utopian idea of the nationwide choice of the worthiest members to serve in the governmental bodies and the real state of affairs when representatives of the ruling elites use their power for personal purposes, ignoring the needs of society, and distorting the electoral process using manipulative technologies (J. Robinson, G. Almond and others). The paper aims to explain the reasons for such a deviant (opportunistic) behavior of the ruling elite representatives in a meaningful way when making socially significant decisions, using the markets with asymmetric information model by George Akerlof. With unequal access to information flows, «inappropriate» candidates for elective positions displace «good» candidates in accordance with the principle of «negative selection». The compelling nature of these limitations to the democratic approach for elites origin signifies the existence of fundamental restrictions of the applicability of democracy, as well as the need to look for the alternative ways to form the governmental bodies.

About the Author

A. A. Obukhov
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Алексеев П. В. Социальная философия. М.: Проспект, 2017.

2. Крыштановская О. В. Анатомия российской элиты. М.: Захаров, 2005.

3. Розов Н. С. Ценности в проблемном мире: философские основания и социальные приложения конструктивной аксиологии. Новосибирск, 1998.

4. Сен А. Идея справедливости. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара; Фонд «Либеральная Миссия», 2016.

5. Тилли Ч. Демократия. М.: Ин-т общественного проектирования, 2007.

6. Akerlof G. A. The Market for «Lemons»: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1970. Vol. 84. P. 488-500.

7. Almond G., Verba S. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, 1989.

8. Lipset S. M. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York, 1960.

9. Moore B. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Aylesbury, 1966.

10. Morlino L. Anchors and Democratic Change // Comparative Political Studies. 2005. Vol. 38. No. 7. P. 743-770.

11. O'Donnell G. Illusions About Democratization // Journal of Democracy. 1996. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 34-51.

12. Przeworski A. Democracy as an Equilibrium // Public Choice. 2005. Vol. 123. P. 253-273.

13. Schedler A. Measuring Democratic Consolidation // Studies in Comparative International Development. 2001. Vol. 36. No. 1. P. 66-92.


Review

For citations:


Obukhov A.A. INSTITUTIONAL RESTRICTIONS OF THE DEMOCRATIC APPROACH TO THE GENESIS OF ELITES. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2018;16(3):81-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2018-16-3-81-88

Views: 120


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-7517 (Print)