PRACTICAL NORMATIVITY: INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL REASONS
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2018-16-2-42-52
Abstract
The paper considers the connection between normative statements and rational grounds (reasons) for action. It analyzes the nature of practical syllogism and its role in conceptions of practical rationality. The paper also brings to light the difficulties related to differentiating between normative and explanatory reasons and offers ways of bridging the gap between individual rationality and normativity
References
1. Аристотель. Никомахова этика // Аристотель. Соч.: В 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1984. Т. 4.
2. Карпович В. Н., Шевченко А. А. Рациональность и нормативность: вера и знание // Вестн. Новосиб. гос. ун-та. Серия: Философия. 2013. Т. 11, № 2. С. 16-23.
3. Юм Д. Трактат о человеческой природе // Юм. Д. Соч.: В 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1996. Т. 1.
4. Anscombe G. E. M. On Practical Reasoning // Practical Reasoning. Oxford, 1978. P. 33-45.
5. Broome J. Does Rationality Consist in Responding Correctly to Reasons? // Journal of Moral Philosophy. 2007. No. 4. P. 349-374.
6. Davidson D. Actions, Reasons and Causes // The Journal of Philosophy. 1963. Vol. 60. No. 23. P. 685-700.
7. Finlay S. The reasons that matter // Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 2006. Vol. 84. No. 1. P. 1-20.
8. Korsgaard C. M. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.
9. Raz J. From Normativity to Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2011.
10. Smith M. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
11. Williams B. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1981.
Review
For citations:
Shevchenko A.A. PRACTICAL NORMATIVITY: INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL REASONS. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2018;16(2):42-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2018-16-2-42-52
Views:
168
Email this article 