Vladimir Lenin, Jared Diamond and Martin Heidegger: On one aspect of understanding of early modern history
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-2-144-158
Abstract
The article discusses in a broader historical context the well-known thesis of V. I. Lenin that capitalism was formed as a result of a change in the behavior of large merchants, who, after the state achieves political unity and forms a unified market, switch from trade to the organization of production. Researchers of the 17th century Siberia do not find historical confirmation of Lenin’s scheme, however, it is quite applicable to other countries of the early modern period and to the mechanism of the early stage of the colonial expansion of European powers (I. R. Sokolovsky, 2019). At the same time, J. Diamond’ research pointed out the boundary between “normal” human behavior in the new lands and the behavior of the colonizers of the early modern period. This boundary is a rational or quasi-rational accounting of one’s actions. M. Heidegger calls this approach Gestell. Gestell considers the surrounding world as a calculated resource for self-increasing profit. Using the example of a Swiss wine merchant who died in North America in 1736, the Italian micro-historian K. Ginzburg showed how the merchants and “capitalists” actually acted and what the Gestell that determined their actions looked like in everyday life: predatory appropriation of material and labor resources is gradually getting a solid base of rational calculation.
Keywords
V. I. Lenin,
capitalism,
colonial expansion,
J. Diamond,
M. Heidegger,
Gestell,
micro-history,
K. Ginzburg
About the Author
I. R. Sokolovskii
Institute of History Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan R. Sokolovskii, Candidate of Science (History) Researcher
Novosibirsk
References
1. Aldrich H. Interview // Economic Sociology. 2004. V. 5. No. 5. Р. 6–19 (In Russian)
2. Balatsky E. V. The principle of consistency in the theory of social development // Terra Economicus. 2021. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 36–52. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2021-19-136-52 (In Russian)
3. Derlugyan G. M. Soviet Revolution 1905–1945: Theses for the First Century // Emergency Reserve. Debate about politics and culture. 2017. No. 5(115). Р. 80-96. (In Russian)
4. Diamond J. Collapse. Why do some societies survive while others die. M.: AST, 2008. (In Russian).
5. Heidegger M. History of philosophy from Thomas Aquinas to Kant (winter semester 1926/27) / Ed. by Helmuth Vetter. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag, 2006. XII, 248 p. (Complete Edition. Vol. 23) (In German)
6. Heidegger M. On Event Thinking, / Ed. Peter Trawny. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag, 2013. XCVIII, 1496 p. (Complete Edition. Vol. 73.1) (In German)
7. Heidegger M. Notes I-V. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag, 2015. 530 S. (Complete edition. Vol. 97) (In German)
8. Heidegger M. The saying of Anaximander // Conversation on a country road / Ed. by A.L. Dobrokhotov. M., 1991. Р. 28–69. (In Russian)
9. Heidegger M. The question of technology // Heidegger M. Time and being: articles and speeches. M.: Respublika, 1993. P. 221–238. (In Russian)
10. Heidegger M. The Way to Language // Heidegger M. Time and Being: Articles and Speeches. M.: Respublika, 1993. P. 259–273. (In Russian)
11. Heidegger M. Identity and diff erence / Ed. O. Nikiforov. M.: Logos, 1997. (In Russian) Heidegger M. Notes from the workshop // Heidegger M. The source of artistic creation. M.: Academic project, 2008. P. 422–424. (In Russian)
12. Khut L. R. Theoretical and methodological pr oblems of studying the history of modern times in Russian historiography at the turn of the 20th–21st centuries. M.: Prometheus, 2010. (In Russian)
13. Lenin V. I. What are the «friends of the people» and how are they fi ghting against the Social Democrats? (Response to the articles of «Russian wealth» against the Marxists)] // Lenin V. I. Works. M.: Politizdat Publ., 1958a. vol. 1. (In Russian)
14. Lenin V. I. The development of capitalism in Russia // Lenin V. I. Works. M.: Politizdat Publ., 1958b, vol. 3. (In Russian)
15. Medic H. Microhistory // THESIS. 1994. No. 4. P. 193–202. (In Russian)
16. Philosophy, science, humanism in the era of global turbulence: Sat. scientifi c tr. Vseross. scientifi c conf. Novosibirsk: NSU, 2018. (In Russian)
17. Rozov N. S. Macrosociological theories of the last third of the 20th – early 21st century. // Theory and methodology of history: a textbook for universities / Ed. ed. V. V. Alekseev, N. N. Kradin, A. V. Korotaev, L. E. Grinin. Volgograd: Uchitel, 2014. Р. 167–183. (In Russian)
18. Safonov A. L. Nations and ethnic groups in the historical process: problems of philosophical conceptualization: monograph. M.: MGIU, 2015. (In Russian)
19. Sokolovsky I. R. On “capital” and “capitalism” in the works of Soviet historians // Siberian Philosophical Journal. 2019. V. 17. No. 2. Р. 158–173. (In Russian)
20. Tkachuk M. E. The coming past or the present future? Left Reformation vs Liberal Archaism // Svobodnaya Mysl. 2015. No. 2 (1650). Р. 5–22. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Sokolovskii I.R. Vladimir Lenin, Jared Diamond and Martin Heidegger: On one aspect of understanding of early modern history. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2023;21(2):144-158. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-2-144-158
Views:
385
Email this article 