Asimov’s laws of robotics: conceptual foundations and cognitive fallacies
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2024-22-4-5-24
Abstract
Asimov’s laws of robotics provide rare common ground, a kind of commandments for all sides of ethical discourse on artificial intelligence. Practical implementation of these «laws», however, faces fundamental problems which are studied in this work. In particular, the first «law» on the prevention of harm to humans does not specify, the harm to whom is meant; the second «law» on the subordination of a robot to a human does not specify, which of the subjects willing to control this robot must be preferred. Elementary examples show that with ubiquitous conflicts of interest, both these abstractly-humanistic laws are untenable. Even in the absence of such conflicts, the «prevention of harm» requires a robot to foresee the consequences of certain actions in the arbitrarily distant future, which contradicts the laws of physics and biology. Finally, it is shown that formulations of all three laws, obviously ridiculous in application to inanimate instruments, assume that robots have freedom of action, fallaciously endowing them with subjectness. Such misplaced anthropomorphism, typical for the ongoing discussions of artificial intelligence, has a foothold in stable language forms. A bundle of the revealed fallacies makes up an erroneous conceptual system, threatening social security in transition to future technological lifestyles.
About the Author
I. A. Surov
ITMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ilya A. Surov, Candidate of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics)
St. Petersburg
References
1. Asimov I. I, Robot. New York: Gnome Press, 1950.
2. Asimov I. Th e Worlds of Isaac Asimov. Th e fi rst book. Th e perfect robot. Moscow: Polaris, 1994. 668 p. (in Russian)
3. Alekseyeva I. Yu. Ethics of Artifi cial Intelligence as Applied Ethics // Philosophy and Society. 2024. No. 3. P. 69–85. (in Russian)
4. Alekseev A. P., Alekseeva I. Yu. Th e status of ethical codes in the ethics of artifi cial intelligence // Information Society. 2024. No. 4. P. 43–49. (in Russian)
5. Alimova S. Z., Kamenskaya I. B. Critical reception of the cycle of Isaac Asimov’s short stories “I, robot” // Formation of professional competence of a philologist in a multicultural educational environment. Materials of the II International Scientifi c and Practical Conference. ed. I.B. Kamenskaya. Yevpatoria, 2019. P. 23–26. (in Russian)
6. Baturin Y. M., Polubinskaya S. V. Artifi cial intelligence: legal status or legal regime? // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2022. No. 10. P. 141–154. (in Russian)
7. Borzykh S. Anthropomorphism of artifi cial intellect // Journal of philosophical research. Vol 5. No. 2. P. 2–9. (in Russian)
8. Bueno P. P., Jankowski S. Judgement aft er Automation: Posthumanist Refl ections on Asimov’s Laws of Robotics // Journal of Science Fiction and Philosophy. 2024. Vol. 7. P. 1–19.
9. Caporael L. R. Anthropomorphism and mechanomorphism: Two faces of the human machine // Computers in Human Behavior. 1986. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 215–234.
10. Clarke R. Asimov’s laws of robotics: implications for information technology. Part 1 // Computer. 1993. Vol. 26. No. 12. P. 53–61.
11. Clarke R. Asimov’s laws of robotics: Implications for information technology. Part 2 // Computer. 1994. Vol. 27. No. 1. P. 57–66.
12. Cleeremans A., Allakhverdov V. M., Kuvaldina M. (eds.) Implicit learning: 50 years on. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2019. 262 p.
13. Dronova E. A. Artifi cial intelligence and the sociology of morality // Free thought. 2024. No. 4. P. 55–62. (in Russian)
14. Eskov V. M. Th e End of certainty: the chaos of homeostatic systems. Tula: TPPO, 2017. 595 p. (in Russian)
15. Eskov V. et al. Chaotic brain // Complexity. Mind. Postnonclassical. 2022. No. 2. P. 5–16. (in Russian)
16. Frensch P. A., Rünger D. Implicit Learning // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2003. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 13–18.
17. Grebenshchikova E. G. Ethics as governance // Siberian Philosophical Journal. 2018. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 135–146. (in Russian)
18. Guthrie S. E. Anthropomorphism: A defi nition and a theory // Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals / Ed. R. W. Mitchell, N. S. Th omson, H. L. Miles. State University of New York Press, 1997. P. 50–58.
19. Karpov V. E., Gotovtsev P.M., Roizenzon G. V. On the issue of ethics and artifi cial intelligence systems // Philosophy and Society. 2018. No. 2. P. 84–105. (in Russian)
20. Kruzhalova L. V. Problems of the relationship between natural and artifi cial intelligence (robots) in the works of science fi ction (K. Chapek, I. Varshavsky, A. Asimov, etP.) // International Journal of Professional Science. 2023. No. 9. P. 5–13. (in Russian)
21. Latieva A. R. Th e interaction of science fi ction concepts and society. In the collection Problems of Modern Socio-cultural Research. Ed. E.V. Hlyshheva, R.T. Aliev, V.L. Tihonova, O.I. Zakutnov. Astrahan’: Astrakhan University Publishing House, 2019. P. 77–81. (in Russian)
22. Levin M. Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere: An Experimentally-Grounded Framework for Understanding Diverse Bodies and Minds // Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2022. Vol. 16. P. 768201.
23. Lyon P. et al. Reframing cognition: getting down to biological basics // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2021. Vol. 376. No. 1820. P. 20190750.
24. Maslova K. K. Transformation of the «robot’s» image from «mechanical similarity» to the «robot-human» (K. Chapeka, E. I. Zamyatin, O. Huxley, A. Asimov) // Bulletin of Slavic Cultures. 2018. Vol. 49. P. 161–170. (in Russian)
25. McCauley L. AI Armageddon and the Th ree Laws of Robotics // Ethics and Information Technology. 2007. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 153–164.
26. Melnikova E., Surov I. Legal Status of Artifi cial Intelligence from Quantum-Th eoretic Perspective // BRICS Law Journal. 2023. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 5–34.
27. Nigomatullina R. M. Ethics as an ontology of management // Siberian Philosophical Journal. 2022. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 15–25. (in Russian)
28. Panov A. D. Technological singularity, Penrose’s theorem on artifi cial intelligence and the quantum nature of consciousness // Information Technologies (Supplementary). 2014. No. 5. P. 1–32. (in Russian)
29. Popova A.V. Ethical principles of interaction with artifi cial intelligence as a basis of legal regulation // Th e rule of law: theory and practice. 2020. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 34–43. (in Russian)
30. Popova N. N. Development of artifi cial intelligence technologies in the prospects of transformation of law: legal consciousness in the projection of the future // Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Jurisprudence. 2021. No. 3. P. 65–76. (in Russian)
31. Persson E., Hedlund M. Th e Trolley Problem and Isaac Asimov’s First Law of Robotics // Journal of Science Fiction and Philosophy. 2024. Vol. 7. P. 1–21.
32. Placani A. Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy // AI Ethics. 2024. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 691–698.
33. Razin A.V. Ethics of artifi cial intelligence // Philosophy and society. 2019. Vol. 1. No. 90. P. 57–93. (in Russian)
34. Rubik B. Artifi cial intelligence and the human biofi eld: New Opportunities and Challenges // Cosmos and History: Th e Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy. 2018. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 153–162.
35. Shibaeva K. V., Khokhlova L. N. Isaac Asimov’s Th ree Laws of robotics: on the question of the humanity of the use of deadly autonomous weapons systems in war // Th eolo gy Philosophy Law. 2018. Vol. 8. No. 4. (in Russian)
36. Surov I. A., Melnikova E. N. Subjectness of Intelligence: Quantum-Th eoretic Analysis and Ethical Perspective // Foundations of Science. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-024-09947-y
37. Surov I. A. Quantum Concept of Free Choice // Proceedings of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023, Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 68–82. (in Russian)
38. Toyoshima Y. et al. Ensemble dynamics and information fl ow deduction from whole-brain imaging data // PLOS Computational Biology. 2024. Vol. 20. No. 3. P. E1011848.
39. Vladimirova Z. V. On possible ways of endowing artifi cial intelligence with legal personality // Bulletin of the Magistracy. 2021. No. 8. P. 50–55. (in Russian)
40. Vodolazov G. G. Humanism abstract and humanism real // Proceedings of the international scientifi c and educational conference «Humanism and Modernity» Kazan: Kazanskij (Privolzhskij) federal’nyj universitet, 2013. P. 30–40. (in Russian)
41. Vvedenskaya E. V. Actual problems of roboetics // Scientifi c research. 2019. № 2019. P. 88–101. (in Russian)
42. Vysochina D. S. Th e everyday life of the predicted world (collection of short stories by A. Asimov «I, robot») // Bulletin of the Kaluga University. Series 2. Studies in philology. 2023. No. 3. P. 70–76. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Surov I.A. Asimov’s laws of robotics: conceptual foundations and cognitive fallacies. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2024;22(4):5-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2024-22-4-5-24
Views:
16
Email this article 