The linguistic aspect in the demonology of Thomas Hobbes
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-4-74-86
Abstract
The paper focuses on the linguistic aspect of demonology in «Leviathan» by Thomas Hobbes. Firstly, demonology is considered as a danger to political stability in «Leviathan». Secondly, the main points of the philosophy of language and the place of metaphor in Hobbes’ political philosophy are presented. Thirdly, through Hobbes’ understanding of metaphor, ways of neutralizing demonological prejudice in «Leviathan» and the sovereign’s monopoly right to use metaphors are discussed.
About the Author
A. Yu. TeterinRussian Federation
Artyom Yu. Teterin postgraduate student
Tomsk
References
1. Ankersmit F. R. Aesthetic politics: political philosophy beyond fact and value. M.: Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2014. (in Russian)
2. Bertman M. A. Hobbes on language and reality // Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 1978. Vol. 32. № 126(4). P. 536–550.
3. Biletzki A. Talking Wolves: Thomas Hobbes on the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.
4. Bodin J. De La Demonomanie Des Sorciers. Saint Petersburg: Chaosss Press, 2021. (in Russian)
5. Champion J. The Kingdom of darkness: Hobbes and heterodoxy // The Intellectual Consequences of Religious Heterodoxy, 1600–1750 / Ed. by S. Mortimer and J. Robertson. Leiden: Brill, 2012. Vol. 211. P. 95–120.
6. Cromartie A. The God of Thomas Hobbes // The Historical Journal. 2008. Vol. 51. № 4. P. 857–879.
7. Curley E. Hobbes and the Cause of Religious Toleration // The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan / Ed. by P. Springborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 309–334.
8. Filippov A. F. The relevance of Hobbes’ philosophy (II) // Russian Sociological Review. 2009. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 113–122. (in Russian)
9. Gorham G. Hobbes and evil // The History of Evil in the Early Modern Age: 1450– 1700 CE. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018. Vol. 3. P. 168–178.
10. Hobbes T. Works: in 2 vols. M.: Mysl’, 1989. V. 1. 1991. V. 2. (in Russian)
11. Hull G. Building Better Citizens: Hobbes against the Ontological Illusion // Epoche. 2015. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 105–129.
12. Maslakov A. S., Kondrat’eva S. B. Thomas Hobbes and paradoxes of thinking of the early modern period // Philosophical Thought. 2023. № 3. P. 33–72. (in Russian)
13. McClure C. S. Hell and anxiety in Hobbes’s Leviathan // The Review of Politics. 2011. Vol. 73. № 1. P. 1–27.
14. Monateri P. G. The Birth of the Leviathan. Heterodoxy and Daemonology in Western Political Thought // The Cardozo Electronic Law Bulletin. 2019. Vol. 25. № 2. P. 1–33.
15. Morrow J. L. Leviathan and the swallowing of scripture: the politics behind Thomas Hobbes’ early modern biblical criticism // Christianity & Literature. 2011. Vol. 61. № 1. P. 33–54.
16. Nikulina A. G. (Meta)physics of the body Thomas Hobbes // Modern Studies of Social Issues. 2016. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 226–233. (in Russian)
17. Pleshkov A. The status of language in the political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes // Russian Sociological Review. 2011. Vol. 10. № 3. P. 29–40. (in Russian)
18. Schmitt C. The Concept of the Political // Sociology of Power. 2011. № 8. P. 173–190. (in Russian)
19. Schuhmann K. Phantasms and idols: true philosophy and wrong religion in Hobbes // Rivista di storia della filosofia. 2004. № 1. P. 15–31.
20. Starkstein S. A Conceptual and Therapeutic Analysis of Fear. Freemantle: Springer, 2018.
21. Stillman R. E. Hobbes’s «Leviathan»: Monsters, Metaphors, and Magic // ELH. 1995. Vol. 62. № 4. P. 791–819.
22. Tralau J. Deception, politics and aesthetics: The importance of Hobbes’s concept of metaphor // Contemporary Political Theory. 2014. Vol. 13. P. 112–129.
23. Whelan F. G. Language and its abuses in Hobbes’ political philosophy // American Political Science Review. 1981. Vol. 75. P. 59–75.
24. Wolin Sh. S. Politics and Vision. Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
Review
For citations:
Teterin A.Yu. The linguistic aspect in the demonology of Thomas Hobbes. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2023;21(4):74-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-4-74-86