Preview

Siberian Journal of Philosophy

Advanced search

Alan Dershowitz’s “Protocol Torture”

https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-4-59-73

Abstract

The article attempts to reconstruct the analytical debates on the morality of torture. The tragic events of September 11, 2001 served as a pretext for renewing the discussion. Professor of law Alan Dershowitz initiated debates on the justification of torture in extraordinary circumstances. Dershowitz’s argument consists of several key propositions: a) we must acknowledge the widespread use of torture; b) we should bring torture into the realm of law. Dershowitz’s idea has met both support and criticism from various professional humanitarians. Despite the tremendous amount of criticism, Dershowitz’s argumentation in many aspects still remains one of the few ways to engage in a substantive debate in favor of the use of torture.

About the Author

I. I. Diatlov
Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Specialized Educational Scientific Center of Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

Ivan I. Diatlov, Junior Researcher; Lecturer

Novosibirsk



References

1. Bauman Z. Liquid Modernity. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2008. 240 p. (In Russian)

2. Brecher B. Torture and The Ticking Bomb. L.: Willey-Blackwell, 2007. 132 p.

3. Brecher B. Torture and its Apologists // Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics. L.: Willey-Blackwell, 2014. P. 260–273.

4. Dershowitz A. Why Terrorism Works: Understanding the Threat, Responding to the Challenge. Yale: Yale University Press, 2002. 288 p.

5. de Wijze S., Beck S. Interrogating the ‘Ticking Bomb Scenario’: Reassessing the Thought Experiment in advance // The International Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2015. Vol. 29. № 1. P. 53–70.

6. Finlay C. Dirty Hands and the Romance of the Ticking Bomb Terrorist: a Humean Account // Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2011. Vol. 14. № 4. P. 421–422.

7. Kleinig J. Torture and Political Morality // Politics and Morality. L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. P. 209–227.

8. Lauritzen P. Torture Warrants and Democratic States. Dirty Hands in an Age of Terror // Journal of Religious Ethics. 2010. Vol. 38. № 1. P. 93–112.

9. Luban D. Liberalism, Torture, and the Ticking Bomb // Virginia Law Review. 2005. Vol. 91. P. 1425–1461.

10. Shue H. Torture // Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1978. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 124–143.

11. Waldron J. Torture and Positive Law: Jurisprudence for the White House // Columbia Law Review. 2005. Vol. 105. № 6. P. 1681–1750.


Review

For citations:


Diatlov I.I. Alan Dershowitz’s “Protocol Torture”. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2023;21(4):59-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-4-59-73

Views: 114


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-7517 (Print)