Transformation of «Narrative» in Socio-Humanitarian Cognition
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-2-71-80
Abstract
The article analyses the gradual development of the narrative and the change in its main features. Initially, the narrative was considered as an authentic reproduction of past experience that is meaningful for the narrator. Later, the definition and study of such attributes of the narrative as sequence, plot, the narrator’s value attitude, and time began. Contemporary research focuses on temporality, causality, the context of narrative formation, certainty (uncertainty) of narrative scenarios, and narrative control. There has been a shift away from viewing the narrative as a finished product towards understanding it as a process of meaning-making from the narrator’s present. Narrative formation is rooted in social or personally meaningful context.
About the Author
E. V. Barbashina
Novosibirsk State Medical University; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evelina V. Barbashina, Doctor of Sciences (Philosophy) Head of the Department of Philosophy; Professor, Department of Philosophy
Novosibirsk
References
1. Barbashina E. V. Problemy medicinskogo narrativa // Idei i Idealy. 2020. Vol. 12. № 3 (1). P. 152–163. (in Russian)
2. Chase S. E. Narrative Inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices // Handbook of qualitative research / Ed. by N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2005. P. 651–679.
3. Franzosi R. Narrative analysis – Or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative // Annual Review of Sociology. 1998. № 24. P. 517–554.
4. Labov W. , Waletzky J. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience // Journal of Narrative and Life History. 1997. № 7. P. 3–38.
5. Lekhcier V. L. Narrativnaya medicina: svetlaya utopiya doktora Rity SHeron? // Obshchestvo remissii: na puti k narrativnoj medicine / Pod red. V.L. Lekhciera. Samara: Izd-vo Samar. gos. un-ta. 2012. P. 110–123. (in Russian)
6. Mishler E. G. A matter of time: when, since, aft er Labov and Waletsky // Journal of Narrative and Life History. 1997. № 7. P. 61–68.
7. Ochs E., Capps L. Living Narrative. Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.
8. Propp V. Ya. Morfologiya skazki (1928). L.: Academia, 1969. (in Russian)
9. Rayn M.-L. Toward a Defi nition of Narrative // The Cambridge Companion to Narrative / Ed. by D. Herman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 22–36.
10. Schegloff E. A. “Narrative Analysis” thirty years later // Journal of Narrative and Life History. 1997. № 7. P. 97–106.
11. Stanley L. To the letter: Th omas and Znaniecki’s Th e Polish Peasant and writing a life,sociologically // Life Writing. 2010. №7 (2). P. 139–151. DOI: 10.1080/14484520903445271
12. Zhenett Z. H. Raboty po poetike. Figury / Per. s fr. E. Vasil’evoj, E. Gal’covoi, E. Grechanoj, I. Itkina, S. Zenkina, N. Percova, I. Staf, G. SHumilovoj. Vol. 2. M.: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovyh, 1998. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Barbashina E.V. Transformation of «Narrative» in Socio-Humanitarian Cognition. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2023;21(2):71-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-2-71-80
Views:
437
Email this article 