Preview

Siberian Journal of Philosophy

Advanced search

A pragmatic turn in the philosophy of language in the context of problems of preservation and development of minority languages

https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-2-17-25

Abstract

By the beginning of the twenty-first century essentialism is giving way to the constructivist paradigm in the field of social sciences and humanities. However, linguistic essentialism survived all the shocks and received a classical form in the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis of linguistic relativism. The application of this hypothesis to the analysis of linguistic communities puts majority and minority languages in different positions: it makes strong languages even stronger, and simply kills small ones. The task of preserving minority languages in programs built using this methodology turns out to be impossible. In our humble opinion, two research paradigms are more adequate for the purpose. One of them is associated with the pragmatic turn in the analytical philosophy of language and represents a transition from the analysis of the structure of the language itself to the analysis of the conditions of communication, taking into account all the sociocultural components of this process. The second methodology is Erving Goff man’s concept of social face and performative behavior.

About the Author

M. N. Chistanov
Khakass State University
Russian Federation

Marat N. Chistanov, Doctor of Science (Philosophy), Docent. Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Criminal Law Disciplines

Abakan



References

1. Antonian K. G., Sokolova N. A. Performative practices in the design of national identity images. // Bulletin of Saint Petersburg State University of Culture. 2022. № 3 (52). Р. 6–11. (in Russian)

2. Boroday S. Yu. Th e problem of linguistic relativity today: studies in spatial conceptualization // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2013. No. 4. P. 17–54. (in Russian)

3. Chistanov M. N. Networked Language Communities: From Constructed Languages to Natural Languages // Humanitarian Vector. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 4. P. 176–183. DOI: 10.21209/19967853-2022-17-4-176-183.

4. Chistanov M. N. Comparative pragmatics of natural and artifi cial language in the context of the problem of protecting indigenous languages // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofi ya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2023. Vol. 73. P. 36–43. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/73/3

5. Humboldt V. On the diff erence in the structure of human languages and its infl uence on the spiritual development of the human race // Humboldt V. Selected Works on Linguistics. Moscow: Progress, 1984. P. 37–297. (in Russian)

6. Rudneva E. A. Strategies of linguistic politeness in spontaneous speech interaction: A thesis submitted in partial fulfi llment of the requirements for the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Th eory of Language). St. Petersburg, 2018. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Chistanov M.N. A pragmatic turn in the philosophy of language in the context of problems of preservation and development of minority languages. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2023;21(2):17-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-2-17-25

Views: 317


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-7517 (Print)