Foundation, Options and Forms of Interface Between Synergetics and Socio-Humanities Knowledge (Exemplified by Separatism Processes)
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2022-20-2-112-126
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of the convergence between social and humanities knowledge and synergetics as a set of methodological principles. N.S. Rozov’s Theoretical History as a Scientific Research Program is taken as a separate field of social and humanities knowledge. It is proposed to consider the correlation of methodological principles of synergetics and theoretical and methodological provisions of Theoretical History by means of the methodological Principle of Complementarity. The heuristics of this correlation and possible forms of its implementation are exemplified by the study of separatism.
About the Author
E. S. Ermakov
Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Evgeny S. Ermakov, Postgraduate student, Department of Theory of Knowledge and Methodology of Science, Institute of Philosophy
Minsk
References
1. Budanov V.G. Metodologiya sinergetiki v postneklassicheskoi nauke i v obrazovanii [Methodology of Synergetics in Post-non-classical Science and in Education]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo LKI, 2009, 240 p. (In Russ.)
2. Ermakov E.S. «Fazovaya» model’ separativnykh protsessov: ot stabil’nosti k raspadu sotsial’no-politicheskikh obshchnostei i sistem [“Phase” Model of Sseparative Processes: From Stability to the Collapse of Social-Political Communities and Systems]. Izvestiya Gomel’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni F. Skoriny [Proceedings of the F. Skorina Gomel State University], 2019a, no. 1, pp. 163–169. (In Russ.)
3. Ermakov E.S. Filosofsko-metodologicheskii instrumentarii analiza i modelirovaniya separativnykh protsessov [Philosophical and Methodological Tools for Analysis and Modeling of Separative Processes]. Filosofskie issledovaniya [Philosophical Studies], 2019b, Vol. 6, pp. 45–57. (In Russ.)
4. Horowitz Donald L. Patterns of Ethnic Separatism. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 1981, Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 165–195.
5. Knyazeva E.N. Epistemologicheskii konstruktivizm [Epistemological Constructivism]. In: Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 12: Fenomen soznaniya. Moscow, IF RAN, 2006, pp. 133–153. (In Russ.)
6. Rozov N.S. Filosofiya i teoriya istorii. Kn. 1. Prolegomeny [Philosophy and Theory of History. Book. 1. Prolegomena]. Moscow, LENAND, 2019a, 336 p. (In Russ.)
7. Rozov N.S. Filosofiya i teoriya istorii. Kn. 2. Prichiny, dinamika i smysl revolyucii [Philosophy and Theory of History. Book. 2. Causes, Dynamics and Meaning of the Revolution]. Moscow, KRASAND, 2019b, 608 p. (In Russ.)
8. Turov N.L. Fenomen separatizma v sovremennom mire: analiticheskii obzor [The Phenomenon of Separatism in the Modern World: Analytical Review]. Moscow, 2021, 62 p.
9. Vasil’kova V.V. Poryadok i khaos v razvitii sotsial’nykh sistem : Sinergetika i teoriya sotsial’noi samoorganizatsii [Order and Chaos in the Evolution of Social Systems: Synergetics and the Theory of Social Self-organization]. St. Petersburg, Lan’, 1999, 480 p. (In Russ.)
10. Vinnik D.V. «Epistemicheskii iskupitel’»: svod priemov legitimatsii bessmyslitsy [“Epistemic Redeemer”: a Set of Еechniques for legitimizing Nonsense]. Filosofiya nauki [Philosophy of Science], 2016, no. 3, pp. 76–93. (In Russ.)
11. Zelenkov A.I. Sotsial’naya sinergetika: metodologicheskie vozmozhnosti i predely v epokhu global’nykh riskov [Social Synergetics: Methodological Possibilities and Limits in the Age of Global Risks]. Filosofiya i sotsial’nye nauki [Philosophy and Social Sciences], 2016, no. 4, pp. 11–15. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Ermakov E.S. Foundation, Options and Forms of Interface Between Synergetics and Socio-Humanities Knowledge (Exemplified by Separatism Processes). Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2022;20(2):112-126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2022-20-2-112-126
Views:
275
Email this article 