Coherence of Socio-Cultural Processes: On the Problem of Methodology
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2022-20-2-103-111
Abstract
The article deals with the problems of methodology for studying the dynamics of socio-cultural processes of local communities in the context of globalization. The purpose of the study is a methodological analysis of the problem of competition, from the point of view of global and local specifics of the development of culture and sociality. Modernization processes generate a paradigm of socio-cultural development that fixes the scale of action, methods and means of interrelation and existence of elements and subsystems that influence the formation of evolution models of the socio-cultural space. The emerging models of socio-cultural development have a high degree of dynamism, maintaining a certain level of locality in the sphere of socio-cultural life. The use of the coherence principle makes it possible to ensure the identification of all components and modifications of the socio-cultural system.
About the Author
V. S. Shmakov
Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir S. Shmakov, Doctor of Science (Philosophy), Leading Researcher
Novosibirsk
References
1. Erokhov I. A. Postglobalizaciya i politicheskaya arhaizaciya v Rossii [Postglobalization and political archaization in Russia]. World politics, 2020, no. 2, p. 1–25. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2020.2.33335 (In Russ.)
2. Lapin N.I. Sociokulturnii podhod i societalno-funkcionalnie strukturi [Sociocultural approach and societal-functional structures] Sociologicheskie issledovaniya”. 2000, no. 7, p. 2–12. (In Russ).
3. Lineckii A.I. Modernizaciya tradicionnih obschestv_ put k procvetaniyu ili doroga v nikuda [Modernization of traditional societies: the path to prosperity or the road to nowhere?]. Policy. Political studies, 2017, no. 4, p. 118–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.04.09
4. Martens P., Dreher A., Gaston N. Globalisation, the global village and the civil society // Futures Volume 42, Issue 6. August. 2010. P. 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.01.008
5. Mendis P. Glocalization: The Human Side of Globalization as If the Washington Consensus Mattered. Lulu.com, 2007-01-01. 442 с.
6. Momdzhyan K.K., Podvoyskiy D.G., Krjevov V.S., Antonovskiy A.Yu., Raisa E. Barash. Systematic Theoretical Approach to the Explanation of The Social Reality. Philosophical or Sociological Methodology? [A system-theoretical approach to the explanation of social reality. Philosophical or sociological methodology?]. Questions of philosophy , 2016, no. 1, р. 17–42. (In Russ.)
7. Neklessa A.I. Privatizaciya buduschego. Dvijenie k novoi semantike koncepcii i praktike mira [Privatization of the future. Movement towards new semantics, concepts and practices of the world]. Policy. Political studies, 2020, no. 2, p. 153–166. https//doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.02.11
8. Savickij P. N. Geograficheskie i geopoliticheskie osnovy evrazijstva [Geographical and geopolitical foundations of Eurasianism]. Osnovy evrazijstva. Moscow: Artogeja centr, 2002, p. 297–304. (In Russ.)
9. Sorokin P. Chelovek, civilizaciya, obschestvo [Man, civilization, society]. Moscow: Politizdat. 1992. 543 p. (In Russ)
10. Huntington S. Who are We? Challenges to American national identity [Translated from English by A. Bashkirov]. Moscow: AST, 2008. 637 p. (In Russ)
11. Shmakov V. S. Sociokulturnoe prostranstvo: k probleme obyasneniya i ponimaniya [Sociocultural space: towards the problem of explanation and understanding]. Siberian Philosophical Journal, 2021, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 75–87. (In Russ)
Review
For citations:
Shmakov V.S. Coherence of Socio-Cultural Processes: On the Problem of Methodology. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2022;20(2):103-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2022-20-2-103-111
Views:
256
Email this article 