Polarization of the Geocultural Space of Local Communities of Eurasia
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2022-20-1-26-36
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of the transformation of socio-cultural development of Russia in the context of globalization changes in the world development. The search for the possibility of combining the universalization and localization of the transformation processes of geocultural space, actualizing the problems of intercultural interaction, influencing the content and forms of transformation. The main attention is paid to the analysis of the most significant approaches to the problem of understanding geoculture, local conditions of transformation of socio-cultural space. From a methodological point of view, the use of the civilizational approach makes it possible to identify the specifics of the socio-cultural development of local communities, to trace the interrelationships, the relationship of general civilizational universals and local identity. The use of the geocultural paradigm of explaining and understanding the state of the world socio-cultural development contributes to solving the problem of the correlation of locality and globality, achieving a balance of trust and cooperation in international relations based on a respectful dialogue. As a basic conclusion, we note that two trends are being formed, two multidirectional vectors of movement in the development of the geocultural situation are being established. On the one hand, there is a process of forming models of socio-cultural behavior depending on the resources and technologies available to the community, expressed in an attempt to preserve the traditional way of life. On the other hand, in their development, local communities are subject to the general laws of transformation in the context of global and regional restructuring. These models of socio-cultural behavior unite communities in a specific socio-territorial location.
About the Author
V. S. ShmakovRussian Federation
Vladimir S. Shmakov, Doctor of Science (Philosophy) leading researcher
Novosibirsk
References
1. Druzhinin, А. G. Idei klassicheskogo evraziistva i sovremennost obschestvenno-geograficheskii analiz [The ideas of classical Eurasianism and modernity: sociogeographical analysis]. Rostov on Don; Taganrog, Yuzhnii federalnii universitet, 2021, 270 р. (in Russ.)
2. Gryaznova, Е. V., Afanasev, S. V. К voprosu оЬ opredelenii ponjatija "sociokul'turnoe prostranstvo" [On the question of the definition of the concept of "socio-cultural space"]. Sovremennye issledovanija social'nyh proЬlem, 2019, vol. 11, no. 2, рр. 27-41. (in Russ.)
3. Кissindjer, G. А. Mirovoi poryadok [World Order]. Moscow, AST, 2018, 511 р. (in Russ.)
4. Mezhuev, В. V. Est' li u Rossii svoj "civilizacionnyj kod", i v chem on mozhet zaklyuchat'sya? [Does Russia have its own "civilizational code", and what can it consist of?]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 2018, no. 7, рр. 35-43. (in Russ.)
5. Neklessa, А. 1. Privatizaciya budushchego. Dvizhenie k novoj semantike, koncepcii i praktike mira [Privatization of the future. Movement towards new semantics, concepts and practices of the world]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Policy. Political studies], 2020, no. 2, рр. 153-166. (in Russ.) DOI 10.17976/ jpps/2020.D2.11 Popov, М. Е. The policy of socio-cultural integration: basic theoretical approaches. Policy. Political Studies, 2017, no. 1, рр. 99-115. (in Russ.) DOI 10.17976/jpps/2017.Dl.09
6. Savitsky, Р. N. Geograficheskie i geopoliticheskie osnovy evrazijstva [Geographical and geopolitical foundations of Eurasianism]. In: Osnovy evrazijstva. Moscow, Arktogeya tsentr, 2002, рр. 297-304. (in Russ.)
7. Shmakov, V. S. Sel'skie lokal'nye soobshchestva: k metodologii issledovaniya [Rural Local Communities: Toward а Research Methodology]. Siberian Journal of Philosophy, 2017, vol. 15, no. 4, рр. 135-145. (in Russ.)
8. Tsymbursky, V. L. Morfologiya rossijskoj geopolitiki i dinamika mezhdunarodnyh sistem XVIII-XX vekov [Morphology of Russian geopolitics and dynamics of international systems of the 18th - 20th centuries]. Moscow, Knizhnyj mir, 2016, 496 р. (in Russ.)
9. Wallerstein, 1. After Liberalism. New York, New Press, 1995, 251 р.
10. Wallerstein, 1. Analiz mirovih sistem i situaciya v sovremennom mire [Analysis of world systems and the situation in the modern world]. St. Petersburg, PuЬlishing house "University book", 2001, 416 р. (in Russ.)
11. Wallerstein, 1. Geopolitics and Geoculture: Essays on the Changing World-System. Cambridge, Cambridge Uni. Press, 1991, 242 р.
12. Zamyatin, D. N. Geokulturnoe prostranstvo Rossii klyuchevie polojeniya interpretacii i perspektivnoe geokulturnoe proektirovanie [Geocultural space of Russia: key provisions, interpretations and perspective geocultural design] Razvitie i ekonomika [Development and есопоту], 2014, no. 10, рр. 170-183. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Shmakov V.S. Polarization of the Geocultural Space of Local Communities of Eurasia. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2022;20(1):26-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2022-20-1-26-36