Rational Reasons, Counterfactual Statements and “Impossible Worlds” in the Philosophical Justifications of Thought Experiments
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-3-33-43
Abstract
In his theory of natural laws David Lewis rejects the authenticity of impossible worlds on the grounds that the contradiction contained within his modifier "in (the world) w" is tantamount to a contradiction in the whole theory, which seems unacceptable. At the same time, in philosophical discourse very often researchers use counterfactual situations and thought experiments with impossible events and objects. There is a need to apply the theory of worlds to genuine, concrete, but impossible worlds. One way to do this is to reject Lewis's classical negation on the grounds that it leads to problems of completeness and inconsistency inside the worlds. The proposed extension for impossibility is compatible with Lewis's extensional metaphysics, although it leads to some loss for description completeness in semantics.
About the Author
V. N. KarpovichRussian Federation
Valentin N. Karpovich, Doctor of Sciences (Philosophy) Leading Research Assistant
Novosibirsk
References
1. Barwise J. Information and impossibilities. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1997, vol. 38(4), pp. 488–515.
2. Brogaard B., Salerno J. Remarks on counterpossibles. Synthese, 2013, vol. 190 (4), pp. 639–660.
3. Jago M. Constructing worlds. Synthese, 2012, vol. 189(1), pp. 59–74.
4. Jago M. The Impossible: An Essay on Hyperintensionality. Oxford, 2014.
5. Jago M. Impossible worlds. Noûs, 2015, vol. 49 (4), pp. 713–728.
6. Lewis D. Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic. Journal of Philosophy, 1968, vol. 66, pp. 113–126.
7. Lewis D. Counterfactuals. Oxford, Blackwell, 1973.
8. Lewis D. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford, Blackwell, 1986.
9. Lycan W. Modality and Meaning. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1994
10. Mares E. Who’s afraid of impossible worlds? Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1997, vol. 38 (4), pp. 516–526.
11. Nolan D. Impossible worlds: a modest approach. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1997, vol. 38 (4), pp. 535–572.
12. Priest G. Editor’s introduction. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1997, vol. 38 (4), pp. 481–487.
13. Priest G. Towards Non-Being: The Logic And Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford Uni. Press, 2016.
14. Restall G. Ways things can’t be. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1997, vol. 38 (4), pp. 583-596.
15. Routley R. Exploring Meinong’s Jungle And Beyond. Canberra, Australian National Uni. Press, 1980.
16. Stalnaker R. Impossibilities. Philosophical Topics, 1996, vol. 24, pp. 193–204.
17. Stalnaker R. A Theory of Conditionals. In: N. Rescher (ed.). Studies in Logical Theory. Oxford, Blackwell, 1968, pp. 98–112.
18. Vander Laan D. The ontology of impossible worlds. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1997, vol. 38 (4), pp. 597–620.
19. Varzi A. Inconsistency without contradiction. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1997, vol. 38 (4), pp. 621–639,
20. Zalta E. A classically-based theory of impossible worlds. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1997, vol. 38 (4), pp 640–660.
Review
For citations:
Karpovich V.N. Rational Reasons, Counterfactual Statements and “Impossible Worlds” in the Philosophical Justifications of Thought Experiments. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2021;19(3):33-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-3-33-43