Preview

Siberian Journal of Philosophy

Advanced search

On Epistemic Justice

https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-2-65-74

Abstract

The paper deals with the concept of epistemic justice and analyses two types of epistemic injustice - testimonial and hermeneutical. The latter is given priority due to the fact that any individual inteгaction involves an individual as а member of а certain social group or community. This requires а study into collective epistemic attitudes, first of all - collective prejudices which Ыосk epistemic resources required for understanding and discussing personal and collective experience. The paper also looks into two related topics - the proЬlem of expertise and the phenomenon of post-truth. S. Fuller's charitaЫe interpretation of post-truth helps to show that this approach can solve the main proЬlem of epistemic justice - that of unequal epistemic status of knowers. However, the price of such levelling-down is too high and would require а complete overhaul of the expertise system.

About the Author

A. А. Shevchenko
Institute ofFhilosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

NovosiЬirsk



References

1. Anderson Е. Epistemic justice as а virtue of social institutions. Social Epistemology, 2012, vol. 26, no. 2, рр. 163-173.

2. Breno R. G. Santos. Echo Chambers, Ignorance and Domination. Social Epistemology, 2021, vol. 35, no. 2, рр. 109-119.

3. Fricker М. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford Uni. Press, 2009.

4. Fricker М. Epistemic justice as а condition of political freedom? Synthese, 2013, vol.190, рр. 1317-1332.

5. Fuller S. Post-truth. Knowledge as а power game. Anthem Press, 2018.

6. Hanel Н. Who's to Blame? Hermeneutical Misfire, Forward-Looking Responsibllity, and Collective Accountabllity. Social Epistemology, 2021, vol. 35, no. 2, рр. 173-184.

7. Medina J. Agential Epistemic Injustice and Collective Epistemic Resistance in the Criminal Justice System. Social Epistemology, 2021, vol. 35, no. 2, рр. 185-196.

8. Nichols Т. Smert' ekspertizy. Kak Internet ublvaet nauchnye znaniya [The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against EstaЬlished Knowledge and Why It Matters]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2019. (in Russ.)

9. Shevchenko S. Yu. Presirat' i podskazyvat': epistemicheskaya nespravedlivost' i kontrexpertiza [Incline and admonish: epistemic injustice and counter-expertise]. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2020, vol. 57, no. 2, рр. 20-32. (in Russ.)

10. Тischenko Р. D. Epistemicheskaya nesoravedlivost' kak sistemnaya kommunikativnaya disfunktsiya [Epistemic injustice as а systemic communicative dysfunction]. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2020, vol. 57, no. 2, рр. 42-47. (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Shevchenko A.А. On Epistemic Justice. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2021;19(2):65-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-2-65-74

Views: 544


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-7517 (Print)