Preview

Siberian Journal of Philosophy

Advanced search

On the impact of the visual turn on of historical research

https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2025-23-3-55-62

Abstract

We examine the methodological and epistemological consequences of the visual turn in historical cognition. It is noted that the ongoing transformation of research practices is systemic in nature and is not limited to a simple expansion of the source base of historical science. Special attention is paid to the consideration of historical knowledge through the prism of bodily and present sensory experience. Philosophical reflection focuses not on technology as such, but on changing the form of the very existence of historical knowledge. The limitations of classical analytical and narrative approaches in understanding the visual forms of historical knowledge are demonstrated. The visual is interpreted as a kind of pre-discursive condition for understanding history, generating a semantic excess that cannot be fully verbalized.

About the Author

V. G. Korzh
Khakass State University
Russian Federation

Victor G. Korzh - Senior Lecturer, Department of History

Abakan 



References

1. Ankersmit F. History and tropology: the rise and fall of metaphor. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 2003. (in Russian).

2. Artamonov D. S. Visualization of historical memory: the image of Peter the Great in Internet memes // Praksema. Problemy vizualnoi semiotiki. 2024. No 1(39). P. 9–29. (in Russian).

3. Böhm G. Wie Bilder Sinn erzeugen: die Macht des Zeigens. Berlin: Berlin University Press, 2007. (in German)

4. Chistanov M. N. To the Issue of Visualization of a Historical Narrative // Humanitarian Vector. 2019. Vol. 14, No. 3. Р. 121–127. (in Russian)

5. Danto A. Analytical philosophy of history. Moscow: Ideya-Press, 2002. (inRussian).

6. Dray W. Once again to the question of explaining people’s actions in historical science// Filosofiya i metodologiya istorii. Moscow: Progress, 1977. Р. 37–71 (inRussian).

7. Eldarion A. A. Visual narrative as a way of constituting historical eventfulness // Manuscript. 2025. Vol. 18, No. 2. P. 488–495. (inRussian).

8. Fellmann F. Phänomenologie zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius Verlag, 2006. (in German)

9. Hempel C. Logic of explanation, Moscow: Dom intellektualnoi knigi, 1998. (in Russian).

10. Inishev I. N. Visual, social, imaginative: visual perception as a factor of modern culture // Praksema. Problemi vizualnoi semiotiki. 2016. No 1(7). P. 9–25. (in Russian).

11. Kovalchenko I. D. Source studies of the history of the USSR. Moscow: Visshaya shkola, 1981. (inRussian).

12. Mitchell W. The Pictorial Turn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

13. Pushkarev L. N. Classification of Russian written sources on national history. Moscow: Nauka, 1975. (in Russian).

14. Rorty R. The Linguistic Turn. Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

15. Schmidt S. O. On the classification of historical sources // Vspomogatelnie istoricheskie distsiplini. 1985. Vol. 16. P. 22–25. (inRussian).

16. Sukina L. B. Visual source: prospects, problems and limitations of using an information resource // Uchenie zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2023. Vol. 45, No. 2. P. 95–100. (inRussian).

17. White H. Meta-history: The Historical Imagination in 19th-century Europe. Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University Press, 2002. 528 p. (in Russian).

18. Yumasheva Yu. Y. Source studies of the information age. Moscow: Direct-Media, 2024. (inRussian).


Review

For citations:


Korzh V.G. On the impact of the visual turn on of historical research. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2025;23(3):55-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2025-23-3-55-62

Views: 34

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-7517 (Print)