The phenomenon of terrorism in foreign socio-political theories
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2025-23-3-33-45
Abstract
For a long time, terrorism studies were not built around any methodological constructs and were mainly based on descriptions of individual terrorist groups or organizations, while the study of the reasons for the transition to terrorist activity did not attract attention. Currently, several approaches to the study of the causes and dynamics of terrorism have been found in Western scientific literature, for example, organizational, instrumental, communicative and psychological. The most common of these is the instrumental approach, according to which terrorism is viewed as deliberate violence, a means to an end. This approach has become most widespread among researchers due to its simplicity, since the intention of the actors was formed from their behavior in accordance with logical rules, and information about the dynamics, internal structure of the organization, as well as the motives of its members is practically not used, which ultimately provides a limited context for the interpretation of factual data. Within the framework of the instrumental approach, several theories are identified to explain the causes of terrorism, their heuristic potential in explaining the dynamics of the activities of terrorist organizations and the limitations in the socio-philosophical foundations of explanatory models are shown.
About the Author
N. E. LukyanovRussian Federation
Nikolay E. Lukyanov - Junior Researcher
Novosibirsk
References
1. Bjørgo T. Dreams and disillusionment: engagement in and disengagement from militant extremist groups // Crime Law and Social Change. 2011. Vol. 55. No. 4. P. 277–285. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-011-9282-9
2. Crenshaw M. The Causes of Terrorism // Comparative Politics. 1981. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 379–399.
3. Crelinsten R. Terrorism as Political Communication: the Relationship between the Controller and the Controlled // Eds. P. Wilkinson, A. Stewart. Contemporary Research on Terrorism. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1987. P. 3–23.
4. Downes A. Targeting Civilians in War. London: Cornell University Press, 2008.
5. Goodwin J. The Causes of Terrorism // The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism / Ed. by A. Silke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. P. 251–266.
6. Herman E., O’Sullivan G. The «Terrorism» Industry: The Experts and Institutions that Shape our View of Terror. New York: Pantheon, 1989.
7. Hoffman B. Inside terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.
8. Izgarskaya A.A., Lukyanov N. E. Terrorism in the Modern World-System: Towards the Problem of Prospects for Interdisciplinary Research // Discourse. 2021. Vol. 7. No. 6. P. 5–16. DOI: 10.32603/2412-8562-2021-7-6-5-16 (in Russian)
9. McCauley C., Moskalenko S. Friction: How Radicalization Happens to Them and Us. Oxford University Press, 2011.
10. Özdamar O. Theorizing Terrorist Behavior: Major Approaches and Their Characteristics // Defence Against Terrorism Review. 2008. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 89–101.
11. Pape R. Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Random House, 2006.
12. Sageman M. Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008. DOI: doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt3fhbht.
13. Spaaij R. Understanding Lone Wolf Terrorism: Global Patterns, Motivations and Prevention. Springer, 2012.
14. Tilly C. Terror, Terrorism, Terrorists // Sociological Theory. 2004. Vol. 22. No. 22. P. 5–13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2004.00200.x.
Review
For citations:
Lukyanov N.E. The phenomenon of terrorism in foreign socio-political theories. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2025;23(3):33-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2025-23-3-33-45
JATS XML























