Preview

Siberian Journal of Philosophy

Advanced search

The Problematic of the thing-in-itself in XIX century philosophy

https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2024-22-1-96-104

Abstract

In modern philosophy, the status of the concept of the thing-in-itself and the history of its origin and transformation are being conceptualized. This article examines the conceptual shift that happened to the notion of the thing-in-itself in XIX century philosophy, because this notion still remains important in the context of the possibility of having knowledge about reality and the status of reality itself. The rethinking of the thing-in-itself in the philosophy of Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and neo-Kantianism of the Marburg school (Cohen, Cassirer, Natorp) is considered. A comparative analysis of the works of all these authors allows us to say that the primary orientation of all these authors is to the specific elimination of the concept of the thing-in-itself. The thing-in-itself outside Kantian philosophy went through changes connected with an attempt to get rid of it or to define it in a non-contradictory (because the transcendent form of thing-in-itself gives us a contradiction) way for transcendental philosophy.

About the Author

I. V. Dil
Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Igor V. Dil - 1st year Master’s student, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Ontology and Theory of Knowledge.

Moscow



References

1. Cassirer E. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. M.: University Book, 2002. Vol. 1: Language. (in Russian)

2. Cohen H. Kant’s Theory of Experience. M.: Academic Project, 2012. (in Russian)

3. Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason. M.: Science, 2006. (in Russian)

4. Malabou C. Can We Relinquish the Transcendental? // Philosophical Journal. 2018. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 99–100. (in Russian)

5. Meillassoux Q. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. M.: Cabinet Scientist, 2015. (in Russian)

6. Natorp P. Kant and Marburg School. M.: Territory of the Future Publishing House, 2006. P. 119–144. (in Russian)

7. Nietzsche F. The Will to Power: An Attempted Transvaluation of All Values. M.: Cultural Revolution, 2016. (in Russian)

8. Özen V. O. The Ambiguity in Schopenhauer’s Doctrine of the Thing-in-Itself // The Review of Metaphysics. 2020. Vol. 74. No. 2. P. 251–288.

9. Schopenhauer A. Critique of the Kantian philosophy. M.: Republic, 1999а. P. 350–451. (in Russian)

10. Schopenhauer A. The World as Will and Representation. M.: Republic, 1999б. P. 3–349. (in Russian)

11. Seth A. The Epistemology of Neo-Kantianism and Subjective Idealism // The Philosophical Review. 1893. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 293–315.


Review

For citations:


Dil I.V. The Problematic of the thing-in-itself in XIX century philosophy. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2024;22(1):96-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2024-22-1-96-104

Views: 112


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-7517 (Print)