Philosophical foundations of posthuman communication studies
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2024-22-1-52-69
Abstract
The article examines the philosophical foundations of posthuman communication studies – a new branch of the science of communications aimed at studying the nature and structure of technobiomaterial interactions, communications of material and digital actors, their characteristic mechanisms and trends of mutual influence of forces and processes (both human and non–human), leading to the exchange of actions, affects, emotions and meanings, circulation of energy forces and intensities, material formation and discursive diversity, and, thereby, to material changes – multiplication of the possible through the implementation of its specific invariants. A number of changes that necessitate the institutionalization of posthuman communication studies are analyzed: a new understanding of the «human subject» (rejection of the idea of Cartesian subjectivity); revision of the understanding of information (information as a «formation» / procedural generation, rather than a fixed set of data); expansion of the specifics of understanding the processes of interaction and communication (from exchange of information between subjects to process formation and circulation of affects between bodies / objects). A number of philosophical, research and applied theoretical ideas that influenced the formation of the conceptual sphere of posthuman communication studies are considered.
Keywords
About the Author
A. A. DenikinRussian Federation
Denikin Anton Anatolyevich - сandidate of sciences (culturology), associate professor Head of the Department of Sound Engineering, Russian Institute of Theatre Arts Professor, GITR Film & Television School.
Moscow
References
1. Barad K. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. L.: Duke University Press, 2007.
2. Barkova E.V. Marriage of a person with a robot as a problem of communication studies // Communication strategies of the information Society: Proceedings of the XI International Scientific and Theoretical Conference. St. Petersburg: Polytech-Press, 2019. Р. 50–52. (in Russian)
3. Bateson G. Reason and nature: the inevitable unity / Trans. from English and predis. D. Ya. Fedotov. M.: URSS, 2016. (in Russian)
4. Blackman L. The body: the key concepts. N. Y.: Bloomsbury, 2009.
5. Blackman L., Venn C. Affect // Body and Society. 2010. Vol. 16. No. 7. P. 7–28.
6. Braidotti R. Posthuman / Trans. from English by D. Khamis. M.: Gaidar Institute, 2021. (in Russian)
7. Brennan T. The transmission of affect. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 2004.
8. Cobley P. Cultural implications of biosemiotics. Dordrecht: Springer, 2016.
9. Clark A. Natural-born cyborgs: minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. N. Y.: Oxford University Press. 2003.
10. Clough P. T. The new empiricism: affect and sociological method // European Journal of Social Theory. 2009. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 43–61.
11. Deleuze G. Logic of meaning. Yekaterinburg: Business Book, 1998. (in Russian)
12. Deleuze G., Parnet C. Dialogues / Trans. H. Tomlinson, B. Habberjam. L.: The Athlone Press, 1987.
13. Deleuze G., Guattari F. What is philosophy? / Trans. and afterword by S. Zenkina. M.: Academic Project, 2009. (in Russian)
14. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Capitalism and schizophrenia: A Thousand plateaus / Trans. Ya. I. Svirsky. M.: Astrel, 2010. (in Russian)
15. Dukov E. V. Socio-cultural problems of the network // Science of Television. 2013. No. 10. P. 97–108. (in Russian)
16. Dukov E. V. Network: public and art. M.: State Institute for Art Studies. 2016. (in Russian)
17. Fotieva I. V. Scientific status of communication studies: problems of hybrid disciplines // Actual problems of humanities and natural sciences. 2014. No. 3–1. P. 289–291. (in Russian)
18. Galperin P. Y. Introduction to psychology: studies manual. M.: University Book House, 2000. (in Russian)
19. Guattari F. Language, consciousness and society (On the production of subjectivity) // Logos. Book 1. / F. Guattari. Leningrad: Leningrad State University, 1991. P. 152–160. (in Russian)
20. Haraway D. Cyborg Manifesto: science, technology and socialist feminism of the 1980s // Gender theory and Art. Anthology: 1970–2000. M.: Russian Political Encyclopedia, 2005. P. 322–377. (in Russian)
21. Hayles N. K. How we became Posthuman. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.
22. Korbut A. M. “I’m sorry, I can’t understand it in any way”: ways to respond to misunderstanding in human-robot interaction // Laboratory: Journal of Social Research. 2018. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 57–78. (in Russian)
23. Kravchenko A. V. Communication and language: some measures in the subject area of communication studies // Sovremennaya Kommunikativistika. 2013. No. 2. P. 4–9. (in Russian)
24. Kravchenko A. V., Paiunena M. V. Practice held hostage to theory: why it is so hard to learn a foreign language at school // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. 2018. No. 56. P. 65–91. (in Russian)
25. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1999.
26. Latour B. There was no New Time. Essays on symmetric anthropology / Translated from the French by D. Ya. Kalugin; Ed. by O.V. Kharkhordin. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of Europian University at St. Petersburg, 2006. (in Russian)
27. Latour B. The reassembly of the social: an introduction to actor-network theory / Translated from the English by I. Polonskaya; Ed. by S. Gavrilenko. M.: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2014. (in Russian)
28. Lazzarato M. Signs and machines: Capitalism and the production of subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.
29. Luhmann N. Society as a social system / Translated from German A. Antonovsky. M.: Logos Publishing House, 2004. (in Russian)
30. Manning E. The politics of touch: sense, movement, sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.
31. Massumi B. Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.
32. Massumi B. Autonomy of affect // Philosophical Journal. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 110–133. (in Russian)
33. Pepperell R. The posthuman condition: Consciousness beyond the brain. Bristol: Intellect, 2003.
34. Rybalchenko O. V. Communication studies and management of intra-corporate conflicts. Krasnodar: KubGAU, 2019. (in Russian)
35. Shalina I. V. Modern communication studies: study. manual. Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University Publishing House, 2016. (in Russian)
36. Shannon K. Works on information theory and cybernetics / Translated by V. F. Pisarenko. M.: Izdatelstvo inostrannoi literatury, 1963. (in Russian)
37. Stiegler B. Technics and time / La technique et le temps, 1: La faute d’Epiméthée; translated by Richard Beardsworth and George Collins. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1998.
38. Thrift N. Non-representational theory: space, politics, affect. L.: Routledge, 2007.
39. Ulmer Gregory L. Heuretics: the logic of invention. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
40. Varela E., Thompson F., Rosch E. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
41. Venn C. Individuation, relationality, affect: Rethinking the human in relation to the living // Body and Society. 2010. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 129–161.
42. Voskuhl A. Humans, machines, and conversations: An ethnographic study of the making of automatic speech recognition technologies // Social Studies of Science. 2004. Vol. 34. No. 3. P. 93–421.
43. Vygotsky L. S. History of the development of higher mental functions. M.: Yurayt Publishing House, 2017. (in Russian)
44. Wolfe C. What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.
45. Yakovlev I. P. On communicology as a science of communication processes // Vestnik of Moscow State University. Series 18: Sociology and Political Sciences. 1999. No. 3. P. 212–214. (in Russian)
46. Zemlyanova L. M. Communicativistics and the media: An English–Russian dictionary of concepts and terms. M.: Moscow State University, 2004. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Denikin A.A. Philosophical foundations of posthuman communication studies. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2024;22(1):52-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2024-22-1-52-69