Preview

Siberian Journal of Philosophy

Advanced search

On the discussion of the confrontation between Lamarckism and Mendelism in Russia (Novosibirsk Academgorodok, methodological seminars and social embedding of knowledge)

https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-3-121-143

Abstract

The article aims at providing grounds for the analysis of the confrontation of scientific views in the context of E. Agassi’s famous thesis: “science is always socially engaged, but it should not be socially dependent”. This socio-epistemological analysis focuses on the clash between Lysenko’s interpretation of the Lamarckian methodology of H. Spencer’s views and representatives of the Russian school of classical Mendelian genetics. A distinctive feature of Akademgorodok in the 1970s-1980s was that almost every academic institute had a person responsible for organizing a specialized scientific-methodological seminar on philosophical and methodological problems of a particular field of knowledge. Recollections of the participants of these seminars and reconstruction of the issues discussed at that time are rich empirical material, providing an opportunity to test modern conceptions in the field of social anthropology, social epistemology, and sociology of science. The revival of genetics in our country began with the founding of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences/SB RAS. It is shown that this confrontation between Lamarckism and Mendelism in 1930s-1960s develops from the denial of the theses of the ideological opponents to the emergence of accompanying interdisciplinary research. At the same time, a special role is given to the specification of the methodological function of philosophy and to those forms of its realization that scientists personally participating in scientific-methodological seminars, were more inclined to associate with “substantive” rather than “sociological” aspects of the description of the situation.

About the Author

A. Yu. Storozhuk
Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS
Russian Federation

Anna Storozhuk, Doctor of Sciences (Philosophy) Leading Researcher, Institute of Philosophy and Law

Novosibirsk



References

1. Agazzi E. Scientific Objectivity аnd Its Contexts. Springer, 2014.

2. Agazzi E. Scientific Objectivity аnd Its Contexts. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2017. (in Russian)

3. AlstonW. BeliefForming Practices and the Social // Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge / Ed. by F. Schmitt. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994. P. 29–52.

4. Belyaev D. K. Problems of human biology: genetic realities and tasks of synthesis of social and biological // Nature. 1976. № 6. P. 26–30. (in Russian)

5. Belyaev D. K. Destabilizing selection as a factor of domestication // Genetics and the welfare of mankind. M.: Nauka, 1981а. P. 53–66. (in Russian)

6. Belyaev D. K. About some methodological problems of biology // Methodological and philosophical problems of biology. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1981б. P. 10–20. (in Russian)

7. Belyaev D. K. Contemporary science and problems in human research // Voprosy Filosofii. 1981в. № 3. P. 3–16. (in Russian)

8. Belyaev D. K. Contemporary science and problems in human research // Philosophy and Contemporary Science. Ed. by I. Frolov. M.: Znanie, 1982a. P. 39–69. (in Russian)

9. Belyaev D. K. Social and biological within human // Political Education. 1982б. № 2. P. 33–41. (in Russian)

10. Belyaev D. K. Destabilizing selection // Development of evolutionary theory in the USSR (1917-1970) / Ed. by S.R. Mikulinsky, Yu.I. Polyansky. Leningrad: Nauka, 1983. Р. 266–277. (in Russian)

11. Bloor D. A strong program in the sociology of knowledge // Logos. 2002. Vol. 5/6. № 35. P. 1–24. (in Russian)

12. Chetverikov S. S. On some aspects of the evolutionary process from the point of view of modern genetics // Journal of Experimental Biology. Part A. 1926. Vol. 2. P. 3–54. (in Russian)

13. Darwin C. The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication / Charles Darwin. Selected Works [in 9 vols.]. M.: RAS Press, 1951. Vol. 4. (in Russian)

14. Darwin C. Natural Selection: Written from 1856 to 1858 / Ed. by R. Stauffer. Cambridge University Press, 1975.

15. Dubinin N. P., Sidorov B. N. Dependence of gene action on its position in the system // Biol. J. 1934. Vol. 3. № 2. P. 304–331. (in Russian)

16. Dubinin N. P., Khvostova V. V. The mechanism of formation of complex chromosomal reorganizations // Biol. J. 1935. Vol. 4. № 6. P. 935–975. (in Russian)

17. Frolov I. T. Life and knowledge. On dialectics in modern biology. M.: Mysl, 1981. (in Russian)

18. Frolov I. T. Selected works [in 3 vols.]. M.: Mysl, 1981. Vol. 2. Philosophy and History of Genetics. (in Russian)

19. Goldman A. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press, 1999.

20. Graham L. Science, Philosophy, and Human Behavior in the Soviet Union. M.: Politizdat, 1991. (in Russian)

21. Joravsky D. Soviet Marxism and Natural Science (1917–1932). Columbia University Press, 1961.

22. Inge-Vechtomov S. G. The role of genetic processes in modificational variability // Ontogenez. 2005. Vol. 36. № 4. P. 274–279. (in Russian)

23. Kimura M. The Role of Compensatory Neutral Mutations in Molecular Evolution // Journal of Genetics. 1985. Vol. 64. P. 7–19.

24. Kitcher P. Contrasting Conceptions of Social Epistemology // Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge / Ed. by F. Schmitt. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994. P. 111–134.

25. Lamarck J.-B. Philosophy of Zoology. M.: State Publishing House of Biological and Medical Literature, 1933. (in Russian)

26. Lobashev M. E. Physiological genetics of the mutation process // Research in Genetics. Issue 6. Leningrad State University, 1976. P. 3–14. (in Russian)

27. Lysenko T. D. Agrobiology. Works on genetics, breeding and seed production. Moscow: State Publishing House of Agricultural Literature, 1948. (in Russian)

28. Michurin I. V. Selected Works. M.: Moskovsky Rabochiy, 1950. (in Russian)

29. Morgan T., Sturtevant A., Muller H., Bridges C. The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity. N.Y.: Henry Holt & Co., 1915.

30. Morgan T. Selected Works in Genetics. Moscow: State Publishing House of Agricultural Literature, 1937. (in Russian)

31. Moskalenko A. T. The System and forms of realization of philosophical (methodological) seminars in research organizations of Siberian Branch of USSR Academy of Sciences // Methodological problems of contemporary sciences. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1979. P. 185–204. (in Russian)

32. Moskalenko A. T. Methodological problems of complex program-target research // Methodological problems of complex research. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1983. P. 104–135. (in Russian)

33. Naegeli K. Uber den Einfluss ausserer Verhaltnisse auf die Varietatenbildung im Pflanzenreiche. S Franz in Komm., 1865.

34. Present I. I. Class struggle on the natural sciences front. Processed transcript of the report at the Conference of Natural Science Teachers in Leningrad. М.: Ogiz-Uchpedgiz, 1932. (in Russian)

35. Provine W. The Origin of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago University Press, 1970.

36. Rouse J. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.

37. Shumny V. K. Siberian stronghold of the Weismann-Morganists // Dmitry Konstantinovich Belyaev: Book of Memories / Ed. by Shumny V.K. Novosibirsk: SB RAS Publishing house, 2002. P. 199–212. (in Russian)

38. Shumny V. K., Zakharov I. K et al. Genetics accretes with Siberia. The first two decades of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Acade my of Sciences. Novosibirsk: ICG SB RAS, 2012. (in Russian)

39. Simanov A. L. Methodological function of philosophy and scientific theory. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986. (in Russian)

40. Spencer H. Foundations of Biology [in 2 vols.]. Sankt-Petersburg: N.P. Polyakov, 1870. (in Russian)

41. Stalin I. V. Anarchism or socialism? // I. Stalin. Selected Works. М.: State Publishing House of Political Literature, 1946. Vol. 1. P. 294–372. (in Russian)

42. Trut L. N. Evolutionary experiment // Science from first hand. 2007. Vol. 14. № 2. P. 60–63. (in Russian)

43. Vasilyeva V. N. Apple trees in Siberia. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1991. (in Russian)

44. Vavilov N. I. The law of homological series in hereditary variability // Theoretical foundations of plant breeding. Ed. by V.I. Vavilov. M.: State Publishing House of Agricultural Literature, 1935. Vol. 1. P. 75–128. (in Russian)

45. Yogansen V. L. Elements of the exact doctrine of variability and heredity with the basics of biological variation statistics. M.: State Publishing House of Agricultural Literature, 1933. (in Russian)

46. Zakharov I. K., Herbek Yu. E., Trapezov O. V. Dmitry Konstantinovich Belyaev. Evolution compressed in time commensurate with the human age // Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2012. Vol. 16. № 2. P. 321–338. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Storozhuk A.Yu. On the discussion of the confrontation between Lamarckism and Mendelism in Russia (Novosibirsk Academgorodok, methodological seminars and social embedding of knowledge). Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2023;21(3):121-143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-3-121-143

Views: 219


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-7517 (Print)