The Problem of Justifying Torture in Analytical Ethics in the 1970s-1980s
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-3-45-56
Abstract
The article reconstructs a brief period of intensive debates on the legitimacy and justification of torture in the early 1970s to the mid-1980s. It is shown that the emergence of the discourse on the morality of torture was influenced by the following factors. Firstly, the formulation of the “dirty hands” dilemma, which in the analytical tradition became a crucial tool for analyzing the relationship between ends and means. Secondly, the establishment of a theoretical and applied field of philosophical research known as the just war theory. Although it should be acknowledged that the transfer of heuristics from the just war theory as a means of argumentation in favor of torture proved to be a philosophical deadlock, it allowed for the exploration of possibilities and limitations of new theoretical developments in the field of moral philosophy, which is always a necessary stage for the reiteration of debates.
About the Author
I. I. Diatlov
Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS; Specialized Educational Scientific Center of Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan I. Diatlov, Junior Researcher; Lecturer
Novosibirsk
References
1. Améry J. Torture // Améry J. At the Mind’s Limit. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1980. P. 21–40.
2. Grotius H. On the Rights on War and Peace. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1956. 868 p. (in Russian)
3. Lauritzen P. Torture Warrants and Democratic States. Dirty Hands in an Age of Terror // Journal of Religious Ethics. 2010. Vol. 38. № 1. P. 93–112.
4. Levy N. Punishing the Dirty // Politics and Morality. ed. by Igor Primoratz. L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. P. 38–53.
5. Meisels T. Contemporary Just War: Theory and Practice. N. Y.: Routledge, 2017. 184 p.
6. Nielsen K. There is No Dilemma of Dirty Hands // Politics and Morality / ed. by Igor Primoratz. L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. P. 20–37.
7. Parrish J. M. Paradoxes of Political Ethics: From Dirty Hands to the Invisible Hand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 296 p.
8. Rawls J. Theory of Justice. M.: Izdatel’stvo LKI, 2010. 536 p. (in Russian)
9. Sartre J. P. Gryaznymi rukami: P’esy [Dirty Hands. Plays]. M.: OOO «Firma “Izdatel’stvo ACT”», 1999. 431 p. (in Russian)
10. Shue H. Torture // Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1978. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 124–143.
11. Sussman D. What is Wrong with Torture? // Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2004. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 1–33.
12. Swanson E., Moore A. S. Witnessing Torture Perspectives of Torture Survivors and Human Rights Workers. L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 288 p.
13. Walzer M. Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands // Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1973. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 160–180.
14. Walzer M. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. N. Y.: Basic Books, 1977. 400 p.
15. Walzer M. Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. N. Y.: Basic Books, 1983. 363 p.
16. Walzer M. Emergency Ethics // Arguing About War. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004. P. 33–50.
Review
For citations:
Diatlov I.I. The Problem of Justifying Torture in Analytical Ethics in the 1970s-1980s. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2023;21(3):45-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-3-45-56
Views:
191
Email this article 