Ethnocultural Communities in the Global Information Environment: Russian Context
https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-2-88-100
Abstract
The development of digital and information technologies for social communication has transformed the traditional ways of reproducing ethnic solidarity. This produced an unprecedented moЬilization effect of ethnic self-organization. The article solves two proЬlems: firstly, it offers а classification of ethnic networks based on the allocation of goals and moЬilization guidelines, and secondly, it fixes new ways of constructing them using innovative communication tools. The conclusion is made about the strengthening of the autonomy of ethnic structures of self-organization in the context of the transformation of the global information environment.
About the Author
Е. А. ErokhinaRussian Federation
Novosibirsk
References
1. Erokhina Е. А. Severnyj "nomadizm": moЬilnost etnicheskikh grupp korennogo i nekorennogo naseleniya v praktikakh prostranstvennogo osvoeniya Siblri (na primere Surgutskogo rajona КНМАО - Yugry) ["Nomadism" of the North: MoЬility of Ethnic Groups of Indigenous and Non-indigenous Population in the
2. Practices of Spatial Development ofSiberia (the Case ofSurgut region ofYugra)]. The New Research ofTuva, 2019, no. 3, рр. 66-76. (in Russ.)
3. Fedotova V. G. Modernization of the "Other" Europe. Moscow, Institute of Philosophy RAS, 1997. (in Russ.)
4. Kuzheleva-Sagan 1. Р., Suchkova N. А. The Ontology of the Network Society and the Culture of Digital Nomads: Methodological Approaches Ontologiya setevogo obshchestva i kultura setevykh kochevnikov: metodologicheskie podkhody. Tomsk State University Journal, 2019, no. 440, рр. 58-63. (in Russ.)
5. Litvinova Т. N. The Challenges of Socio-economic and Political Modernization in the North Caucasus [Vyzovy sotsialno-ekonomicheskoj i politicheskoj modernizatsii na Severnom Kavkaze]. The Science, the Culture, the Society, 2016, no. 4, рр. 22-33. (in Russ.)
6. Lotman Yu. М., Uspensky В. F. On the Semiotic Mechanism ofthe Culture. In: Publications on the Sign Systems. Tartu, 1971, рр. 144-166. (in Russ.)
7. Lushnikova О. L. Sociocultural Capital of the Tribe in Modern Conditions: Sociological Analysis. Abakan, Khakass state university Press, 2015. (in Russ.)
8. Namrueva L. V. Ethnocultural Potential as а Factor of Stabllity of Interethnic Relations in the RepuЬlic of Kalmykia (based on the 2017 survey). In: Palmovsky Bulletin, National Museum of the RepuЬlic of Kalmykia, Elista, 2017, рр. 27-31. (in Russ.)
9. Osmuk L. А. The Modernization of Traditional Socio-cultural Practices in Siberia. [Modernizatsiya traditsionnykh sotsiokulturnykh praktik v Siblri]. Siberian Socium, 2018, vol. 2, no. 3, рр. 51-61. (in Russ.)
10. Proskurin S. G., Sannikov S. V. Transferences of Information in Space and Time: Cultural Transfers [Perenosy informatsii vo vremeni i prostranstve: kulturnye transfery]. Critique and Semiotics, 2018, no. 2, рр. 238-249. (in Russ.)
11. Shanin Т. Expolar Structures and the Informal Economy of Modern Russia. In: The Informal Economy. Russia and the World. Moscow, 1999, рр. 11-32. (in Russ.)
12. Shtompka Р. Sociology of Social changes. Moscow, Aspect-Press, 1996. (in Russ.)
13. Tadina N. А. From the Tribal "Stones" of Altai People to the MemoraЫe Signs of the Altai RepuЬlic [Ot rodovykh "kamnej" altajtsev do pamyatnykh znakov RespuЬliki Altaj]. Bulletin of Archeology, anthropology and ethnography of Eurasia, 2018, no. 3 (42), рр. 142-150. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Erokhina Е.А. Ethnocultural Communities in the Global Information Environment: Russian Context. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2021;19(2):88-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-2-88-100