<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sibphil</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сибирский философский журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Siberian Journal of Philosophy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-7517</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Новосибирский государственный университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25205/2541-7517-2018-16-2-5-18</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sibphil-72</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АНАЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ, ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY, EPISTEMOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ЛОГИКА, МОРАЛЬ И РАЦИОНАЛЬНОСТЬ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>LOGIC, ETHICS, AND RATIONALITY</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Карпович</surname><given-names>В. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Karpovitch</surname><given-names>V. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">kkvvnn@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт философии и права СО РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>10</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Карпович В.Н., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Карпович В.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Karpovitch V.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/72">https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/72</self-uri><abstract><p>Обоснован тезис о том, что моральные теории и практика должны удовлетворять минимальному логическому требованию непротиворечивости. Поскольку логика часто считается основным критерием рациональности, теоретические основы различных трактовок этики можно считать рациональными с точки зрения совместимости теоретических построений и их практической реализации.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article offers the thesis that moral theories and practice should satisfy the minimal logical requirement of consistency. Since logic is often considered the main criterion of rationality, the theoretical foundations of various interpretations of ethics can be considered rational in this respect.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>мораль</kwd><kwd>этика</kwd><kwd>теория</kwd><kwd>практика</kwd><kwd>непротиворечивость</kwd><kwd>рациональность</kwd><kwd>логика</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>morality</kwd><kwd>ethics</kwd><kwd>theory</kwd><kwd>practice</kwd><kwd>consistency</kwd><kwd>rationality</kwd><kwd>logic</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Грязнов А. Ф. Аналитическая философия: Избранные тексты. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1993.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Грязнов А. Ф. Аналитическая философия: Избранные тексты. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1993.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ролз Дж. Теория справедливости. Новосибирск, 1995.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ролз Дж. Теория справедливости. Новосибирск, 1995.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Черч А. Введение в математическую логику. М.: Изд-во иностр. лит., 1960.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Черч А. Введение в математическую логику. М.: Изд-во иностр. лит., 1960.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Этика // Энциклопедический словарь / Под ред Р. Г. Апресяна, А. А. Гусейнова. М.: Гардарики, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Этика // Энциклопедический словарь / Под ред Р. Г. Апресяна, А. А. Гусейнова. М.: Гардарики, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gensler H. Formal Ethics. London: Routledge, 1996.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gensler H. Formal Ethics. London: Routledge, 1996.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hare R. M. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hare R. M. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
