sibphilСибирский философский журналSiberian Journal of Philosophy2541-7517Новосибирский государственный университет10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-4-74-86sibphil-651Research ArticleИСТОРИЯ ФИЛОСОФИИHISTORY OF PHILOSOPHYЯзыковой аспект в демонологии Томаса ГоббсаThe linguistic aspect in the demonology of Thomas HobbesТетеринА. Ю.TeterinA. Yu.

Артем Юрьевич Тетерин аспирант

Томск

Artyom Yu. Teterin postgraduate student

Tomsk

avronconst@gmail.comНациональный исследовательский Томский государственный университетРоссияNational Research Tomsk State UniversityRussian Federation2023101020242147486Copyright © Тетерин А.Ю., 20242024Тетерин А.Ю.Teterin A.Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/651

Исследуется языковой аспект демонологии в «Левиафане» Томаса Гоббса. Демонология рассматривается как опасность для политической стабильности в «Левиафане». Представлены основные положения философии языка и место метафоры в политической философии Гоббса. Через понимание Гоббсом метафоры обсуждаются способы нейтрализации демонологических предрассудков в «Левиафане» и монопольное право суверена на использование метафор.

The paper focuses on the linguistic aspect of demonology in «Leviathan» by Thomas Hobbes. Firstly, demonology is considered as a danger to political stability in «Leviathan». Secondly, the main points of the philosophy of language and the place of metaphor in Hobbes’ political philosophy are presented. Thirdly, through Hobbes’ understanding of metaphor, ways of neutralizing demonological prejudice in «Leviathan» and the sovereign’s monopoly right to use metaphors are discussed.

Т. ГоббсдемонологиялевиафанметафорасуверенязыкdemonologyТ. HobbeslanguageLeviathanmetaphorsovereignReferencesАнкерсмит Ф. Р. Эстетическая политика. Политическая философия по ту сторону факта и ценности. М.: Изд. дом Высш. шк. экон., 2014.Ankersmit F. R. Aesthetic politics: political philosophy beyond fact and value. M.: Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2014. (in Russian)Боден Ж. О демономании колдунов. СПб.: Chaosss Press, 2021.Bertman M. A. Hobbes on language and reality // Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 1978. Vol. 32. № 126(4). P. 536–550.Гоббс Т. Сочинения: в 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1989. Т. 1. 1991. Т. 2.Biletzki A. Talking Wolves: Thomas Hobbes on the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.Маслаков А. С., Кондратьева С. Б. Томас Гоббс и парадоксы мышления раннего нового времени // Философская мысль. 2023. №. 3. С. 33–72.Bodin J. De La Demonomanie Des Sorciers. Saint Petersburg: Chaosss Press, 2021. (in Russian)Никулина А. Г. (Мета)физика тела Томаса Гоббса // Современные исследования социальных проблем. 2016. Т. 25. № 1. С. 226–233.Champion J. The Kingdom of darkness: Hobbes and heterodoxy // The Intellectual Consequences of Religious Heterodoxy, 1600–1750 / Ed. by S. Mortimer and J. Robertson. Leiden: Brill, 2012. Vol. 211. P. 95–120.Плешков А. Статус языка в политической философии Томаса Гоббса // Социологическое обозрение. 2011. Т. 10. №. 3. С. 29–40.Cromartie A. The God of Thomas Hobbes // The Historical Journal. 2008. Vol. 51. № 4. P. 857–879.Филиппов А. Ф. Актуальность философии Гоббса. Статья вторая // Социологическое обозрение. 2009. Т. 8. №. 3. С. 113–122.Curley E. Hobbes and the Cause of Religious Toleration // The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan / Ed. by P. Springborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 309–334.Шмитт К. Понятие политического // Социология власти. 2011. №. 8. С. 173–190.Filippov A. F. The relevance of Hobbes’ philosophy (II) // Russian Sociological Review. 2009. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 113–122. (in Russian)Bertman M. A. Hobbes on language and reality // Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 1978. Vol. 32. № 126(4). P. 536–550.Gorham G. Hobbes and evil // The History of Evil in the Early Modern Age: 1450– 1700 CE. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018. Vol. 3. P. 168–178.Biletzki A. Talking Wolves: Thomas Hobbes on the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.Hobbes T. Works: in 2 vols. M.: Mysl’, 1989. V. 1. 1991. V. 2. (in Russian)Champion J. The Kingdom of darkness: Hobbes and heterodoxy // The Intellectual Consequences of Religious Heterodoxy, 1600–1750 / Ed. by S. Mortimer and J. Robertson. Leiden: Brill, 2012. Vol. 211. P. 95–120.Hull G. Building Better Citizens: Hobbes against the Ontological Illusion // Epoche. 2015. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 105–129.Cromartie A. The God of Thomas Hobbes // The Historical Journal. 2008. Vol. 51. № 4. P. 857–879.Maslakov A. S., Kondrat’eva S. B. Thomas Hobbes and paradoxes of thinking of the early modern period // Philosophical Thought. 2023. № 3. P. 33–72. (in Russian)Curley E. Hobbes and the Cause of Religious Toleration // The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan / Ed. by P. Springborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 309–334.McClure C. S. Hell and anxiety in Hobbes’s Leviathan // The Review of Politics. 2011. Vol. 73. № 1. P. 1–27.Gorham G. Hobbes and evil // The History of Evil in the Early Modern Age: 1450–1700 CE. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018. Vol. 3. P. 168–178.Monateri P. G. The Birth of the Leviathan. Heterodoxy and Daemonology in Western Political Thought // The Cardozo Electronic Law Bulletin. 2019. Vol. 25. № 2. P. 1–33.Hull G. Building Better Citizens: Hobbes against the Ontological Illusion // Epoche. 2015. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 105–129.Morrow J. L. Leviathan and the swallowing of scripture: the politics behind Thomas Hobbes’ early modern biblical criticism // Christianity & Literature. 2011. Vol. 61. № 1. P. 33–54.McClure C. S. Hell and anxiety in Hobbes’s Leviathan // The Review of Politics. 2011. Vol. 73. № 1. P. 1–27.Nikulina A. G. (Meta)physics of the body Thomas Hobbes // Modern Studies of Social Issues. 2016. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 226–233. (in Russian)Monateri P. G. The Birth of the Leviathan. Heterodoxy and Daemonology in Western Political Thought // The Cardozo Electronic Law Bulletin. 2019. Vol. 25. № 2. P. 1–33.Pleshkov A. The status of language in the political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes // Russian Sociological Review. 2011. Vol. 10. № 3. P. 29–40. (in Russian)Morrow J. L. Leviathan and the swallowing of scripture: the politics behind Thomas Hobbes’ early modern biblical criticism // Christianity & Literature. 2011. Vol. 61. № 1. P. 33–54.Schmitt C. The Concept of the Political // Sociology of Power. 2011. № 8. P. 173–190. (in Russian)Schuhmann K. Phantasms and idols: true philosophy and wrong religion in Hobbes // Rivista di storia della filosofia. 2004. № 1. P. 15–31.Schuhmann K. Phantasms and idols: true philosophy and wrong religion in Hobbes // Rivista di storia della filosofia. 2004. № 1. P. 15–31.Starkstein S. A Conceptual and Therapeutic Analysis of Fear. Freemantle: Springer, 2018.Starkstein S. A Conceptual and Therapeutic Analysis of Fear. Freemantle: Springer, 2018.Stillman R. E. Hobbes’s «Leviathan»: Monsters, Metaphors, and Magic // ELH. 1995. Vol. 62. № 4. P. 791–819.Stillman R. E. Hobbes’s «Leviathan»: Monsters, Metaphors, and Magic // ELH. 1995. Vol. 62. № 4. P. 791–819.Tralau J. Deception, politics and aesthetics: The importance of Hobbes’s concept of metaphor // Contemporary Political Theory. 2014. Vol. 13. P. 112–129.Tralau J. Deception, politics and aesthetics: The importance of Hobbes’s concept of metaphor // Contemporary Political Theory. 2014. Vol. 13. P. 112–129.Whelan F. G. Language and its abuses in Hobbes’ political philosophy // American Political Science Review. 1981. Vol. 75. P. 59–75.Whelan F. G. Language and its abuses in Hobbes’ political philosophy // American Political Science Review. 1981. Vol. 75. P. 59–75.Wolin Sh. S. Politics and Vision. Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Wolin Sh. S. Politics and Vision. Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.