<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sibphil</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сибирский философский журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Siberian Journal of Philosophy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-7517</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Новосибирский государственный университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25205/2541-7517-2022-20-4-21-36</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sibphil-571</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АНАЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ, ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY, EPISTEMOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Аргумент исключения ментальной причинности и уровни организации живых объектов</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Mental Causality Exclusion Argument and the Levels of Organization of Living Objects</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9103-9721</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Черезова</surname><given-names>Е. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Cherezova</surname><given-names>E. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><sec><title>Черезова Елена Борисовна, аспирант</title></sec></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Cherezova Elena Borisovna, post-graduate student</title></sec></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Новосибирский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Novosibirsk State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Черезова Е.Б., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Черезова Е.Б.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Cherezova E.B.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/571">https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/571</self-uri><abstract><p>Цель работы – продемонстрировать возможность непротиворечиво принять существование эффективной ментальной причинности в фундаментально физическом мире. Мы полагаем, что понятие причинности в аргументе исключения Дж. Кима против ментальной причинности, подразумевающее генеративную концепцию каузальных отношений, может быть пересмотрено с учетом концепции специфичности многоуровневой организации живых объектов. Отказ от механистической модели причинности как линейного процесса позволяет сохранить приверженность принципу каузальной замкнутости физического мира и в то же время объяснить, как возможна нисходящая причинность макроуровня. Мы используем модель фрактального дерева причинных цепочек Дж. Лоу, в которой ментальная причинность играет роль косвенной причины факта. Содержательное различение причинности фактов и событий мы проводим, прибегая к многоуровневой модели Дж. Эллиса, в которой ментальную причинность можно рассматривать как факт макроуровня, оказывающий селективное влияние на физические события нижележащих уровней с учетом широкого средового контекста.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper aims to demonstrate the possibility of consistently accepting the existence of effective mental causality in the fundamentally physical world. We suppose that the concept of causality in J. Kim’s exclusion argument against mental causation, which implies а generative conception of causal relations, can be revised taking into account the specificity of the multilevel organization of living objects. Rejection of the mechanistic model of causality as a linear process, allows you to maintain commitment to the principle of causal closure of the physical world and at the same time explain how top-down causality at the macro level is possible. For this, we use the model of a fractal tree of causal chains by J. Lowe, in which mental causality plays the role of an indirect cause of a fact. We carry out a meaningful distinction between the causality of facts and events by resorting to the multilevel model of J. Ellis, in which mental causality can be considered as a macro-level fact that has a selective effect on physical events of lower levels, taking into account a wide environmental context.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>физикализм</kwd><kwd>эмерджентизм</kwd><kwd>дуализм</kwd><kwd>аргумент исключения</kwd><kwd>ментальная причинность</kwd><kwd>сверхдетерминация</kwd><kwd>уровни организации</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>physicalism</kwd><kwd>emergentism</kwd><kwd>dualism</kwd><kwd>exclusion argument</kwd><kwd>mental causality</kwd><kwd>overdetermination</kwd><kwd>levels of organization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bear M.F., Connors B., Paradiso M. Neuroscience: Exploring the brain. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bear M.F., Connors B., Paradiso M. Neuroscience: Exploring the brain. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bennett K. Exclusion again // Being reduced / Eds. J. Hohwy &amp; J. Kallestrup. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2008. Р. 280–305.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bennett K. Exclusion again // Being reduced / Eds. J. Hohwy &amp; J. Kallestrup. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2008. Р. 280–305.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burge Т. Mind-body causation and explanatory practice // Mental Causation / Eds. J. Heil &amp; A. Mele. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. Р. 96–120.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burge Т. Mind-body causation and explanatory practice // Mental Causation / Eds. J. Heil &amp; A. Mele. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. Р. 96–120.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Churchland P., Sejnowski T. The Computational Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Churchland P., Sejnowski T. The Computational Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Crane T. The signifcance of emergence // Physicalism and its discontents / Eds. C. Gillett, B. Loewer. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001. Р. 207–224.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Crane T. The signifcance of emergence // Physicalism and its discontents / Eds. C. Gillett, B. Loewer. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001. Р. 207–224.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ellis G. F. R. How can physics underlie the mind? Top-down causation in the human context. Heidelberg: Springer, 2016.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ellis G. F. R. How can physics underlie the mind? Top-down causation in the human context. Heidelberg: Springer, 2016.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ellis G.F.R. Physics, Determinism, and the Brain // Top-Down Causation and Emergence / Еds. J. Voosholz, M. Gabriel. Springer, 2021. Р. 157–217.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ellis G.F.R. Physics, Determinism, and the Brain // Top-Down Causation and Emergence / Еds. J. Voosholz, M. Gabriel. Springer, 2021. Р. 157–217.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fodor J. A. Making Mind Matter More // Philosophical Topics. 1989. Vol. 17. № 1. Р. 59– 79.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fodor J. A. Making Mind Matter More // Philosophical Topics. 1989. Vol. 17. № 1. Р. 59– 79.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fodor J. A. Special Sciences: Still Autonomous After All These Years / Noûs, Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives, Mind, Causation, and World. Vol. (31)11. 1997. Р. 149–163.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fodor J. A. Special Sciences: Still Autonomous After All These Years / Noûs, Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives, Mind, Causation, and World. Vol. (31)11. 1997. Р. 149–163.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gibb S. Mental Causation // Analysis. 2014. Vol. 74(2). Р. 327–338.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gibb S. Mental Causation // Analysis. 2014. Vol. 74(2). Р. 327–338.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gibb S. The causal closure principle // Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 65(261). 2015. Р. 626–647.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gibb S. The causal closure principle // Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 65(261). 2015. Р. 626–647.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hoffmann-Kolss V. Interventionism and Higher-level Causation // International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 2014. Vol. 28. № 1. Р. 49–64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hoffmann-Kolss V. Interventionism and Higher-level Causation // International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 2014. Vol. 28. № 1. Р. 49–64.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim J. Concepts of supervenience // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 45. 1984. Р. 153–176.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim J. Concepts of supervenience // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 45. 1984. Р. 153–176.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim J. The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism // Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. 1989. Vol. 63 (3). Р. 31–47.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim J. The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism // Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. 1989. Vol. 63 (3). Р. 31–47.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim J. Downward causation in emergentism and nonreductive physicalism. Emergence or reduction? // Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism / Eds. A. Beckermann, J. Kim, H. Flohr. Berlin; New York: Walther de Gruyter, 1992. Р. 119–138.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim J. Downward causation in emergentism and nonreductive physicalism. Emergence or reduction? // Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism / Eds. A. Beckermann, J. Kim, H. Flohr. Berlin; New York: Walther de Gruyter, 1992. Р. 119–138.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim J. Mind in a physical world: An essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim J. Mind in a physical world: An essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim J. The layered model: Metaphysical considerations / Philosophical Explorations. 2002. Vol. 5. Р. 2–20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim J. The layered model: Metaphysical considerations / Philosophical Explorations. 2002. Vol. 5. Р. 2–20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim J. Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim J. Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim J. Mental Causation // The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. / Eds. B. McLaughlin, A. Beckermann, S. Walter. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2009. Р. 29–52.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim J. Mental Causation // The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. / Eds. B. McLaughlin, A. Beckermann, S. Walter. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2009. Р. 29–52.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Loewer B. Comments on Jaegwon Kim’s mind in a physical world // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2002. Vol. 65. Р. 655–662.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Loewer B. Comments on Jaegwon Kim’s mind in a physical world // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2002. Vol. 65. Р. 655–662.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lowe E. J. Subjects of Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lowe E. J. Subjects of Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lowe E. J. Non-cartesian substance dualism and the problem of mental causation // Erkenntnis. 2006. Vol. 65(1). Р. 5–23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lowe E. J. Non-cartesian substance dualism and the problem of mental causation // Erkenntnis. 2006. Vol. 65(1). Р. 5–23.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Malcolm N. The Conceivability of Mechanism // The Philosophical Review. 1968. Vol. 77. № 1. Р. 45–72.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malcolm N. The Conceivability of Mechanism // The Philosophical Review. 1968. Vol. 77. № 1. Р. 45–72.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McLaughlin B. The rise and fall of British emergentism. Emergence or reduction? // Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism / Eds. A. Beckermann, J. Kim &amp; H. Flohr. Berlin; N. Y.: Walther de Gruyter, 1992. Р. 49–93.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McLaughlin B. The rise and fall of British emergentism. Emergence or reduction? // Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism / Eds. A. Beckermann, J. Kim &amp; H. Flohr. Berlin; N. Y.: Walther de Gruyter, 1992. Р. 49–93.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nagel E. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. N. Y.: Harcourt, Brace&amp; World, 1961.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nagel E. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. N. Y.: Harcourt, Brace&amp; World, 1961.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oppenheim P., Putnam H. The unity of science as a working hypothesis // Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 1958. Vol. 2. Р. 3–36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oppenheim P., Putnam H. The unity of science as a working hypothesis // Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 1958. Vol. 2. Р. 3–36.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Papineau D. Must a physicalist be a microphysicalist? // Being reduced / Eds. J. Hohwy, J. Kallestrup. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2008. Р. 126–148.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Papineau D. Must a physicalist be a microphysicalist? // Being reduced / Eds. J. Hohwy, J. Kallestrup. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2008. Р. 126–148.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Patterson S. Epiphenomenalism and Occasionalism: Problems of Mental Causation, Old and New / History of Philosophy Quarterly. 2005. Vol. 22. № 3. Р. 239–257.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Patterson S. Epiphenomenalism and Occasionalism: Problems of Mental Causation, Old and New / History of Philosophy Quarterly. 2005. Vol. 22. № 3. Р. 239–257.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Putnam H. Psychological Predicates // Art, Mind, and Religion / Eds. W.H. Capitan, D.D. Merrill. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967. Р. 37–48.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Putnam H. Psychological Predicates // Art, Mind, and Religion / Eds. W.H. Capitan, D.D. Merrill. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967. Р. 37–48.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raatikainen P. Kim on Causation and Mental Causation // E-Logos. 2018. Vol. 25(2). Р. 22–47.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raatikainen P. Kim on Causation and Mental Causation // E-Logos. 2018. Vol. 25(2). Р. 22–47.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Searle J. Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Univ. Press, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Searle J. Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Univ. Press, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
