sibphilСибирский философский журналSiberian Journal of Philosophy2541-7517Новосибирский государственный университет10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-1-13-42sibphil-555Research ArticleАНАЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ, ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY, EPISTEMOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCEКьюбизм, феноменология и контекстуальный квантовый реализмQBism, phenomenology, and contextual quantum realismhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1721-6388ПрисьИ. Е.PrisI. E.

Игорь Евгеньевич Прись - доктор философии (PhD), канд. физ.-мат. наук, ведущий научный сотрудник

Минск

Igor Pris - Doctor (PhD) in Philosophy, Candidate of Sciences (Theoretical physics), Leading Researcher

Minsk

frigpr@gmail.comИнститут философии НАН БеларусиРоссияInstitute of Philosophy of NAS of BelarusRussian Federation2023120520232111342Copyright © Прись И.Е., 20232023Прись И.Е.Pris I.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/555

Предлагается критика феноменологической интерпретации квантового байесианизма (кьюбизма), в частности, позиции М. Битболь и Л. де Ля Тремблей, которая удаляет из кьюбизма остатки научного реализма и принимает радикально феноменологическую точку зрения первого лица. Показано, что феноменологический взгляд на квантовую механику не может объяснить познание квантовой реальности и поведение реальных квантовых систем, так как последней реальностью для феноменологии являются автономные феномены, которые на самом деле не существуют. Предлагаемый нами контекстуальный квантовый реализм (ККР) не переворачивает, как это делают упомянутые авторы, а отвергает традиционное отношение между опытом и реальностью. Переинтерпретируя кьюбизм, наш ККР удаляет из него остатки феноменологии, но так, чтобы не впасть в другую крайность - метафизический реализм.

A critique of phenomenological interpretation of quantum Bayesianism (QBism) is offered, in particular, the position of M. Bitbol and L. de La Tremblay, which removes remnants of scientific realism from QBism and adopts a radically phenomenological first person point of view. It is shown that phenomenological view of quantum mechanics cannot explain cognition of quantum reality and behavior of real quantum systems, because the ultimate reality for phenomenology is autonomous phenomena, which, in fact, do not exist. Our proposed contextual quantum realism (CQR) does not invert, as the mentioned authors do, but rejects, the traditional relation between experience and reality. By reinterpreting QBism, our CQR removes remnants of phenomenology from it, but in such a way as not to fall into the other extreme – metaphysical realism.

квантовая механикакьюбизмфеноменологиятрансцендентальная феноменологияопытявлениеконтекстуальный реализмконтекстуальный квантовый реализмвитгенштейновское правилоQuantum mechanicsQBismphenomenologytranscendental phenomenologyexperiencephenomenoncontextual realismcontextual quantum realismWittgensteinian ruleИсследование выполнено при частичной поддержке гранта БРФФИ No Г22МС-001 «Квантовый реализм – контекстуальный реализм. (Кьюбизм и другие интерпретации квантовой механики с точки зрения контекстуального реализма.)».The reported study was partially funded by BRFFR according to the research project No Г22МС-001 «Quantum realism – contextual realism. (QBism and other interpretations of quantum mechanics from the point of view of a contextual realism.)»ReferencesАристотель. Метафизика / Пер. с др.-греч. А. Кубицкого. М.: АСТ, 2020.Аristotle. Metafizika [Metaphysics]. Tr. by А. Kubitsky. Мoscow: АСТ, 2020. (In Russ.)Прись И. Е. Контекстуальность онтологии и современная физика. СПб.: Алетейя, 2020.Bacciagaluppi G. A Critic Looks at QBism. In: Galavotti M., Dieks D., et al. (eds.). New Directions in the Philosophy of Science. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 5. Springer, Cham, 2014. Р. 403–416.Прись И. Е. Бозон Хиггса, квантовые струны и философия физики. СПб.: Алетейя, 2021a.Barbaras R. L’appartenance: Vers une cosmologie phénoménologique. Peeters, 2019.Прись И. Е. О фундаментальном концептуальном принципе квантовой механики // Философия науки. 2021b. No 4 (91). С. 82–92.Bégout B. Le concept d’ambiance. Éditions du Seuil, 2021.Прись И. Е. Знание в контексте. СПб.: Алетейя, 2022a. 720 c.Benoist J. Concepts. Paris: Vrin, 2010.Прись И. Е. О квантовой вероятности // Философия науки. 2022b. No 3(94). C. 46–65.Benoist J. Le bruit sensible. Cerf, 2013.Прись И. Е. Об интерпретации квантовой механики // Философия науки. 2022c. No 2(93). C. 75–94.Benoist J. L’adresse du réel. Paris: Vrin, 2017. 376 p.Фок В. А., Эйнштейн А. et al. Можно ли считать, что квантово-механическое описание физической реальности является полным? // Успехи физ. наук. 1936. Т. XVI. Вып. 4. С. 436–457.Benoist J. (ed.). Réalismes anciens et nouveaux. Paris: Vrin, 2018.Bacciagaluppi G. A Critic Looks at QBism // Galavotti M., Dieks D., et al. (eds.). New Directions in the Philosophy of Science. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 5. Springer, Cham, 2014. Р. 403–416.Benoist J. Objectivité sans perspective // Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica. 2020. CXII, no. 3. Р. 773–788.Barbaras R. L’appartenance: Vers une cosmologie phénoménologique. Peeters, 2019.Benoist J. Toward a Contextual Realism. Harvard UP, 2021. 216 p.Bégout B. Le concept d’ambiance. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2021.Benoist J. Von der Phänomenologie zum Realismus. Die Grenzen des Sinns. Mohr Siebeck, 2022. 177 S.Benoist J. Concepts. Paris: Vrin, 2010.Benoist J. No Limit. On What Thought Can Actually Do. In: Pier, J. Limits of Intelligibility: Issues from Kant and Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, 2023. Р. 262–279.Benoist J. Le bruit sensible. Paris: Cerf, 2013.Berghofer P., Wiltsche H. A. Phenomenological Approaches to Physics: Mapping the Field. In: Wiltsche, H. A., Berghofer, P. Phenomenological Approaches to Physics, Springer, 2020a. Р. 1–47.Benoist J. L’adresse du réel. Paris: Vrin, 2017. 376 p.Berghofer P. Scientific Perspectivism in the Phenomenological Tradition. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2020b, 10: 30.Benoist J. (ed.). Réalismes anciens et nouveaux. Paris: Vrin, 2018.Bitbol M. Maintenant la finitude. Paris: Flammarion, 2019.Benoist J. Objectivité sans perspective // Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica, 2020. vol. CXII. No 3. Р. 773–788.Bitbol M. Phenomenological ontology for physics. Merleau-Ponty and QBism. In: Berghofer, P., Wiltsche, H. (eds.). Phenomenological Approaches to Physics. Synthese Library, Springer, 2020. Р. 227–242.Benoist J. Toward a Contextual Realism. Harvard UP, 2021. 216 p.Bitbol M. Is the life-world reduction sufficient in quantum physics? Continental Review, 2021, vol. 54, no. 4. Р. 563-580Benoist J. Von der Phänomenologie zum Realismus. Die Grenzen des Sinns. Mohr Siebeck, 2022. 177 S.Bitbol M., De La Tremblay L. QBism: An Eco-phenomenology of Quantum Physics, 2022a, URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/20090/ (date of access: 18.02.2023).Benoist J. No Limit. On What Thought Can Actually Do // Pier, J. (ed.). Limits of Intelligibility: Issues from Kant and Wittgenstein. L.: Routledge, 2023. Р. 262–279.Bitbol M., De La Tremblay L. Towards a phenomenological constitution of Quantum Mechanics: A QBist approach. Mind and Matter, 2022b, 20(1), рр. 35–62.Berghofer P., Wiltsche H. A. Phenomenological Approaches to Physics: Mapping the Field // Wiltsche H. A., Berghofer P. Phenomenological Approaches to Physics. Springer, 2020a. Р. 1–47.Bub J. Quantum Mechanics as a Principal Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 2000, 31 (1), рр. 75–94.Berghofer P. Scientific Perspectivism in the Phenomenological Tradition // European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2020b. No 10. Р. 30.Bub J. Quantum Mechanics is About Quantum Information. Foundations of Physics, 2005, vol. 35, no. 4. Р. 541–560.Bitbol M. Maintenant la finitude. Paris: Flammarion, 2019.Bub J. ‘Two Dogmas’ Redux. In: Hemmo M., Shenker O. (eds.). Quantum, Probability, Logic. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2020. Р. 199–215.Bitbol M. Phenomenological ontology for physics. Merleau-Ponty and QBism //Berghofer P., Wiltsche H. (eds.). Phenomenological Approaches to Physics. Synthese Library, Springer, 2020. Р. 227–242.Bub J., Pitowsky I. Two Dogmas about Quantum Mechanics. In: Saunders S., Barrett J., et. al. (eds.). Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, рр. 433–459.Bitbol M. Is the life-world reduction sufficient in quantum physics? // Continental Review. 2021. vol. 54. No 4. Р. 563–580Clifton R., Bub J., et al. Characterizing quantum theory in terms of information-theoretic constraints. Foundations of Physics, 2003, vol. 33. Р. 1561–1591.Bitbol M., De La Tremblay L. QBism: An Eco-phenomenology of Quantum Physics. 2022a. URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/20090/ (date of access: 18.02.2023).Colletti L., Pellegrini P. Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology as a Hermeneutic Framework for Quantum Mechanics. Axiomathes, 2020, vol. 30, no. 1. Р. 49–68.Bitbol M., De La Tremblay L. Towards a phenomenological constitution of Quantum Mechanics: A QBist approach // Mind and Matter. 2022b. No 20(1). Р. 35–62.Crease R. P., Sares J. Interview with physicist Christopher Fuchs. Cotinental Philosophy Review, 2021, vol. 54. Р. 541–561.Bub J. Quantum Mechanics as a Principal Theory // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2000. No 31 (1). Р. 75–94.De La Tremblaye L. QBism from a Phenomenological Point of View: Husserl and QBism. In: Wiltsche H. A., Berghofer P (eds.). Phenomenological Approaches to Physics, 2020. Р. 243–259.Bub J. Quantum Mechanics is About Quantum Information // Foundations of Physics. 2005. vol. 35. No 4. Р. 541–560.Fock В. А., Einstein А., et al. Mozhno li schitat’, chto kvantovo-mekhanicheskoye opisaniye fizicheskoy realnosti yavlyayetsya polnym? [Can the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?]. Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk, 1936, vol. XVI, no, 4. pp. 436–457. (In Russ.)Bub J. ‘Two Dogmas’ Redux // Hemmo M., Shenker O. (eds.). Quantum, Probability, Logic. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2020. Р. 199–215.French S. From a lost history to a new future: Is a phenomenological approach to quantum physics viable? In: Berghofer P., Wiltsche, H. (eds.). Phenomenological Approaches to Physics. Synthese Library, Springer, 2020. Р. 205–226.Bub J., Pitowsky I. Two Dogmas about Quantum Mechanics // Saunders S., Barrett J. et. al. (eds.). Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Р. 433–459.French S. Putting some flesh on the participant in participatory realism. – 2022. – URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/19354/ (date of access: 27.08.2022).Clifton R., Bub J. et al. Characterizing quantum theory in terms of information-theoretic constraints // Foundations of Physics. 2003. Vol. 33. Р. 1561–1591.Fuchs C., Mermin, N. D., et al. An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 2014, vol. 82. Р. 749–54.Colletti L., Pellegrini P. Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology as a Hermeneutic Framework for Quantum Mechanics // Axiomathes. 2020. Vol. 30. No 1. Р. 49–68.Fuchs C. Notwithstanding Bohr, the Reasons for QBism. Mind and Matter, 2018, vol. 15, no. 2. Р. 245–300.Crease R. P., Sares J. Interview with physicist Christopher Fuchs // Continental Philosophy Review. 2021. Vol. 54. Р. 541–561.Fuchs C. On Participatory Realism – 2021a. – URL: ArXiv: 1601.04360v3 [quant-ph]. (date of access: 19.07.2021)De la Tremblaye L. QBism from a Phenomenological Point of View: Husserl and QBism // Wiltsche H. A., Berghofer P (eds.). Phenomenological Approaches to Physics. Synthese Library. Springer, 2020. Р. 243–259.Fuchs C. Stacey B. C. QBians Do Not Exist. – 2021b. – URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14375. (date of access: 19.07.2021).French S. From a lost history to a new future: Is a phenomenological approach to quantum physics viable? // Berghofer P., Wiltsche H. (eds.). Phenomenological Approaches to Physics. Synthese Library. Springer, 2020. Р. 205–226.Glick D. QBism and the Limits of Scientific Realism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2021, 11: 53.French S. Putting some flesh on the participant in participatory realism. 2022. – URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/19354/ (date of access: 27.08.2022).Grinbaum A. Reconstruction of quantum theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2007, vol. 58. Р. 387–408.Fuchs C., Mermin, N. D. et al. An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics // American Journal of Physics. 2014. Vol. 82. Р. 749–54.Healey R. The Quantum Revolution in Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2017.Fuchs C. Notwithstanding Bohr, the Reasons for QBism // Mind and Matter. 2018. Vol. 15. No 2. Р. 245–300.Healey R. Quantum relativity without relativism, 2022, URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/20397/. (date of access: 03.04.2022).Fuchs C. On Participatory Realism. 2021a. URL: ArXiv: 1601.04360v3 [quant-ph]. (date of access: 19.07.2021)Jennings D. Leifer M. No return to classical reality. Contemporary physics, 2016, vol. 57. Р. 60–82.Fuchs C. Stacey B. C. QBians Do Not Exist. 2021b. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14375. (date of access: 19.07.2021).Merleau-Ponty M. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1945.Glick D. QBism and the Limits of Scientific Realism // European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2021. No 11. Р. 53.Merleau-Ponty M. Le visible et l’invisible. Gallimard, 1964.Grinbaum A. Reconstruction of quantum theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2007. Vol. 58. Р. 387–408.Merleau-Ponty M. Nature. Course notes from the Collège de France. Evanston: North-western UP, 2003.Healey R. The Quantum Revolution in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Pienaar J. Extending the agent in QBism. Foundations of Physics, 2020, vol. 50. Р. 1894–1920.Healey R. Quantum relativity without relativism. 2022. URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/20397/. (date of access: 03.04.2022).Pris I. Е. Kontekstualnost ontologii i sovremennaya fizika [Contextuality of Ontology and Contemporary Physics]. St. Petersburg, Aletheia, 2020. (In Russ.)Jennings D. Leifer M. No return to classical reality // Contemporary physics. 2016. Vol. 57. Р. 60–82.Pris I. Е. Bozon Khiggsa. kvantovyye struny i filosofiya fiziki [Higgs boson, quantum strings and philosophy of physics]. St. Petersburg, Aletheia, 2021a. (In Russ.)Merleau-Ponty M. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1945.Pris I. Е. O fundamentalnom kontseptualnom printsipe kvantovoy mekhaniki [On the foundational conceptual principle of quantum mechanics]. Filosofiya nauki [Philosophy of Science], 2021b, vol. 91, no. 4. Р. 82–92. (In Russ.)Merleau-Ponty M. Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Pris I. Е. Znaniye v kontekste [Knowledge in context]. St. Petersburg, Aletheia, 2022a. (In Russ.)Merleau-Ponty M. Nature. Course notes from the Collège de France. Evanston: North-western UP, 2003.Pris I. Е. O kvantovoy veroyatnosti [On quantum probability]. Filosofiya nauki, 2022b, vol. 94, no. 3. Р. 46–65. (In Russ.)Pienaar J. Extending the agent in QBism // Foundations of Physics. 2020. Vol. 50. Р. 1894–1920.Pris I. Е. Ob interpretatsii kvantovoy mekhaniki [On interpretation of quantum mechanics]. Filosofiya nauki, 2022c, vol. 93, no. 2. Р. 75–94. (In Russ.)Rovelli C. Relational quantum mechanics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2019, URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-relational/. (date of access: 06.10.2022).Rovelli C. Relational quantum mechanics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2019, URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-relational/. (date of access: 06.10.2022).Schack R. A QBist reads Merleau-Ponty. 2022. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.11094. (date of access: 03.02.2023.)Schack R. A QBist reads Merleau-Ponty, 2022, URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.11094. (date of access: 03.02.2023.)Stanley J., Williamson T. Knowing How // Journal of Philosophy. 2001. Vol. 98. No 8. Р. 411–44.Stanley J., Williamson, T. Knowing How. Journal of Philosophy, 2001, vol. 98, no. 8. Р. 411–44.Wallace D. The Emergent Multiverse. Quantum Theory according to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Wallace D. The Emergent Multiverse. Quantum Theory according to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford University Press, 2012.Wittgenstein L. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978.Wittgenstein L. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978.Zeilinger A. The message of the quantum // Nature. 2005. Vol. 438. No 8. Р. 743.Zeilinger A. The message of the quantum. Nature, 2005, vol. 438, no. 8. Р. 743.Zinkernagel H. Niels Bohr on the wave function and the classical / quantum divide //Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2016. Vol. 53. Р. 9-19.Zinkernagel H. Niels Bohr on the wave function and the classical/quantum divide. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 2016, vol. 53. Р. 9-19.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.