<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sibphil</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сибирский философский журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Siberian Journal of Philosophy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-7517</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Новосибирский государственный университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25205/2541-7517-2022-20-3-101-113</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sibphil-549</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЯ ФИЛОСОФИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Гамановский Сократ в истории философии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Hamannian Socrates within History of Philosophy</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-1884</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Стрельцов</surname><given-names>А. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Streltsov</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Стрельцов Алексей Михайлович, кандидат философских наук, научный сотрудник</p><p>ул. Николаева, 8, Новосибирск, 630090</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Alexey M. Streltsov, Candidate of Sciences (Philosophy), Fellow</p><p>8 Nikolaev St., Novosibirsk, 630090</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">streltsov@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт философии и права СО РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>101</fpage><lpage>113</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Стрельцов А.М., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Стрельцов А.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Streltsov A.M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/549">https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/549</self-uri><abstract><p>Разбирается место сократической интерпретации И. Г. Гамана на фоне предшествующей традиции и в контексте мысли Просвещения, а также влияние апроприации им сократической проблематики на философию XVIII–XIX вв.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper delineates the place of J. G. Hamann’s interpretation of Socrates in view of the preceding tradition and in the context of the thought of the Enlightenment, as well as the influence of his appropriation of Socratic problematics on philosophy of the 18–19th centuries.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Гаман</kwd><kwd>Мендельсон</kwd><kwd>Гете</kwd><kwd>Гегель</kwd><kwd>Кьеркегор</kwd><kwd>Ницше</kwd><kwd>Просвещение</kwd><kwd>незнание</kwd><kwd>даймон</kwd><kwd>Сократ</kwd><kwd>Сократические достопамятности</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Hamann</kwd><kwd>Mendelssohn</kwd><kwd>Goethe</kwd><kwd>Hegel</kwd><kwd>Kierkegaard</kwd><kwd>Enlightenment</kwd><kwd>ignorance</kwd><kwd>daimon</kwd><kwd>Socrates</kwd><kwd>Socratic Memorabilia</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гегель Г. В. Ф. О сочинениях Гамана / Работы разных лет в двух томах. М.: Мысль, 1972. Т. 1. С. 577–643.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beiser F. C. The Fate of Reason. German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гильманов В. Х. Герменевтика «образа» И. Г. Гамана и Просвещение. Калининград: Изд-во Калинингр. гос. ун-та, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beiser F. C. Diotima’s Children : German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кьеркегор С. Страх и трепет. М.: Республика, 1993.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Betz J. R. Hamann Before Kierkegaard: A Systematic Theological Oversight // Pro Ecclesia. 2007. Vol. 16. № 3. Р. 299–333.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ницше Ф. В. Сочинения: в 2 т. М., 1996. Т. 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Böhm B. Sokrates im 18. Jahrhundert: Studien zum Werdegange des modernen Persönlichkeitsbewusstseins. 2. Auflage. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz Verlag, 1966.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Светлов Р. В. Сократ в пространстве античного воображения // ΣΧΟΛΗ. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция. 2015. Т. 9, № 1. С. 169–184.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Collins A. A Discourse of Free-thinking. L., 1713.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Стрельцов А. М. Аксиологическая проблематика призвания философа в «Сократических достопримечательностях» И. Г. Гамана // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2018. № 43 (3). С. 111–116.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Collins A. A Discourse of the Grounds and Reasons of the Christian Religion. L., 1737.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Стрельцов А. М. Гегелевский Гаман: попытка реконструкции // Сиб. филос. журн. 2020. Т. 18. № 3. С. 104–112.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cooper J. G. The Life of Socrates. 2nd ed. L., 1750.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Филин Д. А. Личность Сократа в святоотеческой традиции // Вестн. Кемер. гос. ун-та культуры и искусств. 2014. № 26. С. 180–185.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dahlstrom D. O. Philosophical Legacies: Essays on the Thought of Kant, Hegel, and Their Contemporaries (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, Volume 50). Washington, D.C.: CUA Press, 2008.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эккерман И. П. Разговоры с Гете. М.: Худож. лит., 1986.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eckermann J. P. Gespräche mit Goethe in den letzten Jahren seines Lebens. 1823-1832. Bd. 1–3. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1836, 1848.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beiser F. C. The Fate of Reason. German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Filin D. A. Lichnost' Sokrata v svyatootecheskoi traditsii [The Personality of Socrates in the Patristic Tradition] // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kultury i iskusstv, 2014, no. 26, p. 180–185. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beiser F. C. Diotima’s Children : German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gilmanov V. H. Germenevtika «obraza» I. G. Gamana i Prosveschenie [Hermeneutic of the «type» of J. G. Hamann and the Enlightenment]. Kaliningrad: Izdatelstvo Kaliningradskogo gos. universiteta, 2003. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Betz J. R. Hamann Before Kierkegaard: A Systematic Theological Oversight // Pro Ecclesia. 2007. Vol. 16. № 3. Р. 299–333.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goethe J. W. Werke. 2. Bd. Weimar: Sophienausgabe, 1887.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Böhm B. Sokrates im 18. Jahrhundert: Studien zum Werdegange des modernen Persönlichkeitsbewusstseins. 2. Auflage. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz Verlag, 1966.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goethe-Handbuch. Hrsgb. Zeitler J. III. Band. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1918.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Collins A. A Discourse of Free-thinking. L., 1713.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hamann J. G. Sämtliche Werke. 2. Bd. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe von J. Nadler. Wien: Herder Verlag, 1950.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Collins A. A Discourse of the Grounds and Reasons of the Christian Religion. L., 1737.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hamann J. G. Londoner Schriften. Historisch–kritische Neuedition von Oswald Bayer und Bernd Weißenborn. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 1993.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cooper J. G. The Life of Socrates. 2nd ed. L., 1750.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hankins J. Socrates in the Italian Renaissance //</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dahlstrom D. O. Philosophical Legacies: Essays on the Thought of Kant, Hegel, and Their Contemporaries (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, Volume 50). Washington, D.C.: CUA Press, 2008.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hay S. K. Hamann: Sharing Style and Thesis: Kierkegaard’s Appropriation of Hamann’s Work // Stewart J. B. (ed.). Kierkegaard and His German Contemporaries: Literature and aesthetics. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2008.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goethe J. W. Werke. 2. Bd. Weimar: Sophienausgabe, 1887.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hegel G. W. F. Hamanns Schriften / Werke 11. Frankfurt am Mein: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag, 1986. S. 275–352.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goethe-Handbuch. Hrsgb. Zeitler J. III. Band. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1918.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kierkegaard S., Dru A. The Journals of Kierkegaard. Harper Torchbooks, Tb 52. N. Y.: Harper &amp; Row, 1959.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hamann J. G. Sämtliche Werke. 2. Bd. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe von J. Nadler. Wien: Herder Verlag, 1950.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kierkegaard S. Strakh i trepet [Frygt og Bæven]. M.: Respublika, 1993. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hamann J. G. Londoner Schriften. Historisch–kritische Neuedition von Oswald Bayer und Bernd Weißenborn. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 1993.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Milbank J. Knowledge: The Theological Critique of Philosophy in Hamann and Jacobi // Milbank J., Pickstock C., Ward G. (eds.). Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology. L.: Routledge, 1999. P. 21–37.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hankins J. Socrates in the Italian Renaissance //</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nietzsche F. W. Works in Two Volumes. Tom 1 [Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. Tom 1]. M.: 1996. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hay S. K. Hamann: Sharing Style and Thesis: Kierkegaard’s Appropriation of Hamann’s Work // Stewart J. B. (ed.). Kierkegaard and His German Contemporaries: Literature and aesthetics. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2008.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O’Flaherty J. C. Hamann’s Socratic Memorabilia: A Translation and Commentary. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press, 1967.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kierkegaard S., Dru A. The Journals of Kierkegaard. Harper Torchbooks, Tb 52. N. Y.: Harper &amp; Row, 1959.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O’Flaherty J. C. Hamann and Nietzsche’s Conception of Socrates: A Comparison // Lange V., Roloff H.–G. (eds.). Dichtung, Sprache, Gesellschaft: Akten des IV. internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses 1970 in Princeton. Frankfurt, 1971. P. 553–561.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Milbank J. Knowledge: The Theological Critique of Philosophy in Hamann and Jacobi // Milbank J., Pickstock C., Ward G. (eds.). Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology. L.: Routledge, 1999. P. 21–37.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O’Flaherty J. C. Socrates in Hamann’s Socratic Memorabilia and Nietzsche’s Birth of Tragedy: A Comparison // Palmer R. B., Hamerton–Kelly R. (eds.). Philomates; Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan. Hague: Nijhoff, 1971. P. 306–329.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O’Flaherty J. C. Hamann’s Socratic Memorabilia: A Translation and Commentary. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press, 1967.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Possen D. Soren Kierkegaard and the Very Idea of Advance Beyond Socrates. Dissertation. Chicago: The University of Chicago, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O’Flaherty J. C. Hamann and Nietzsche’s Conception of Socrates: A Comparison // Lange V., Roloff H.–G. (eds.). Dichtung, Sprache, Gesellschaft: Akten des IV. internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses 1970 in Princeton. Frankfurt, 1971. P. 553–561.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pupi A. Johann Georg Hamann. III. Pelicanus colitudinis 1763–1773. Milano: Vita e pensiero, 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O’Flaherty J. C. Socrates in Hamann’s Socratic Memorabilia and Nietzsche’s Birth of Tragedy: A Comparison // Palmer R. B., Hamerton–Kelly R. (eds.). Philomates; Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan. Hague: Nijhoff, 1971. P. 306–329.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Richter S. J. Goethe Yearbook 14. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Possen D. Soren Kierkegaard and the Very Idea of Advance Beyond Socrates. Dissertation. Chicago: The University of Chicago, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sacchi D. Le ragioni di Abramo. Kierkegaard e la paradossalità del logos. Franco Angeli, 2011.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pupi A. Johann Georg Hamann. III. Pelicanus colitudinis 1763–1773. Milano: Vita e pensiero, 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scaer P. J. The Lucan Passion and the Praiseworthy Death. Sheffield: Sheffield Pnoenix Press, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Richter S. J. Goethe Yearbook 14. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Streltsov A. M. Aksiologicheskaya problematika prizvaniya filosofa v «Sokraticheskikh dostoprimechyatel’nostyakh» I. G. Gamana [Axiological Problems of the Philosopher’s Calling in Hamann’s Socratic Memorabilia] // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, 2018, no. 43 (3), p. 111–116. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sacchi D. Le ragioni di Abramo. Kierkegaard e la paradossalità del logos. Franco Angeli, 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Streltsov A. M. Gegelevskii Gaman: popytka rekonstrurtsii [Hegelian Hamann: Attempt at Reconstruction] // Sibirskii filosofskii zhurnal, 2020, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 104–112. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scaer P. J. The Lucan Passion and the Praiseworthy Death. Sheffield: Sheffield Pnoenix Press, 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Svetlov R. V. Socrat v prostranstve antichnogo voobrazheniya [Socrates in the Space of Ancient Imagination] // ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, 2015, Vol. 9, no. 1, p. 169–184. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thomasius C. Das Ebenbild eines wahren und ohnpedantischen Philosophi, oder Das Leben Socratis, aus dem Frantzösischen des Herrn Charpentier ins Teutsche übersetzt von Christian Thomas. Halle, 1693.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thomasius C. Das Ebenbild eines wahren und ohnpedantischen Philosophi, oder Das Leben Socratis, aus dem Frantzösischen des Herrn Charpentier ins Teutsche übersetzt von Christian Thomas. Halle, 1693.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thouard D. Hamann and the History of Philosophy // Ligota C. R., Quantin J.–L. (eds.). History of Scholarship. A Selecton of Papers from the Seminar on the History of Scholarship Held Annually at the Warburg Institute. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. P. 413–436.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thouard D. Hamann and the History of Philosophy // Ligota C. R., Quantin J.–L. (eds.). History of Scholarship. A Selecton of Papers from the Seminar on the History of Scholarship Held Annually at the Warburg Institute. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. P. 413–436.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thulstrup N. Kierkegaard’s Relation to Hegel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thulstrup N. Kierkegaard’s Relation to Hegel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vlastos G. The Philosophy of Socrates: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, 1971.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vlastos G. The Philosophy of Socrates: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, 1971.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
