<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sibphil</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сибирский философский журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Siberian Journal of Philosophy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-7517</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Новосибирский государственный университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25205/2541-7517-2021-19-3-161-174</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sibphil-463</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЯ ФИЛОСОФИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Философия постмодернизма как условие возникновения постгуманизма</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Postmodern Philosophy as a Condition for the Emergence of Posthumanism Theory</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Криман</surname><given-names>А. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kriman</surname><given-names>A. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Анастасия Игоревна Криман, младший научный сотрудник философского факультета, соискатель кафедры социальной философии и философии истории</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Anastasia I. Kriman, Junior Research Fellow, Faculty of Philosophy, PhD student, Department of Social Philosophy</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">kriman@philos.msu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный университет им. М. В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>161</fpage><lpage>174</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Криман А.И., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Криман А.И.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kriman A.I.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/463">https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/463</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена краткой ретроспективе концепций философского постмодернизма в их связи с постгуманизмом. Постгуманизм – философское течение, активно разрабатываемое в последнее десятилетие, своими корнями уходящее в 60–70-е годы континентальной философии. Дискурс постгуманизма подразумевает работу и развитие концепций и понятий, используемых М. Фуко, Ж. Деррида, Ж. Делёзом и Ф. Гваттари, Р. Бартом и другими. Соединяясь с такими направлениями как disability studies, animal studies, постколониальной философией, акторно-сетевой теорией, интерсекциональным феминизмом, постгуманизм расширяет, дополняет и реинкарнирует многие положения постмодернистской философии. В данной статье будут обозначены основные понятия, используемые в дискурсе постгуманистов.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article presents a brief retrospective of the conceptions of philosophical postmodernism in their connection with posthumanism. Posthumanism is a philosophical movement that has been actively developed in the last decade, with its roots in the 60s and 70s of continental philosophy. The discourse of posthumanism implies work and development of conceptions and notions used by M. Foucault, J. Derrida, J. Deleuze and F. Guattari, R. Barthes and others. Connecting with such philosophical trends as disability studies, animal studies, postcolonial philosophy, actor-network theory, intersectional feminism, posthumanism expands, complements and reincarnates many provisions of postmodern philosophy. This article outlines the main concepts used in posthumanist discourse.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>постгуманизм</kwd><kwd>смерть человека</kwd><kwd>деконструкция</kwd><kwd>номадическая сингулярность</kwd><kwd>множественность</kwd><kwd>де-территоризация</kwd><kwd>ассамбляж</kwd><kwd>ризома</kwd><kwd>пост-антропоцентризм</kwd><kwd>пост-дуализм</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>рosthumanism</kwd><kwd>death of Man</kwd><kwd>deconstruction</kwd><kwd>nomadic subject</kwd><kwd>multiplicity</kwd><kwd>de-territorialization</kwd><kwd>assemblage</kwd><kwd>rhizome</kwd><kwd>de-anthropologization</kwd><kwd>post-anthropocentrism</kwd><kwd>post-dualism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ашкеров А. Ю. Социальная антропология. М.: ООО «Маркет ДС Корпорейшн», 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ashkerov A. Social Anthropology. Moscow, Market DS Сorporation, 2005. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Барт Р. Смерть автора // Барт Р. Избр. работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. М., 1994. С. 384–391.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balibar E. Réponse à la question de Jean-Luc Nancy: «qui vient après le sujet?» In: Citoyen sujet et autres essais d'anthropologie philosophique. Presses Universitaires de France, 2011, pp. 35–66.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Делёз Ж. Логика смысла. М.: Акад. проект, 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barthes R. The Death of the Author. In: Barthes R. Selected Works: Semiotics. Poetics. Moscow, 1995, pp. 384–391. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Делёз Ж. Различие и повторение. СПб.: ТОО ТК «Петрополис», 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Braidotti R. The Posthuman. Cambridge, UK, Polity, 2013.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Делёз Ж. Фуко. М.: Изд-во гуманит. лит., 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deleuze J. Difference and Repetition. St. Petersburg, Petropolis, 1998. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Делёз Ж., Гваттари Ф. Капитализм и шизофрения: Тысяча плато. Екатеринбург: У-Фактория; М.: Астрель, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deleuze J. Foucault. Moscow, Humanity literature Publ., 1998. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Делёз Ж., Гваттари Ф. Капитализм и шизофрения. Анти-Эдип. М., 1990.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deleuze J. The Logic of Sense. Moscow, Akademicheskij Proekt, 2011. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Деррида Ж. Фармация Платона. 2007. URL: http://pharmacie.narod.ru/ (дата обращения: 10.03.2021).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deleuze J., Gvattari F. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Moscow, U-Fakutoriya, Astrel, 2010. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Деррида Ж. О грамматологии. М.: Ad Marginem, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deleuze J., Gvattari F. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Moscow, 1990.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дьяков А. В. Мишель Фуко и его время. СПб.: Алетейя, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Derrida J. Of Grammatology. Moscow, Ad Marginem, 2000. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Криман А. И. Идея постчеловека: сравнительный анализ трансгуманизма и постгуманизма // Философские науки. 2019. Т. 62 (4). С. 132–147.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Derrida J. Plato Pharmacy, 2007. (in Russ.) URL: http://pharmacie.narod.ru/ (accessed: 10.03.2021).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Криман А. И. Постгуманистический поворот к пост(не)человеческому // Вопросы философии. 2020. № 12. С. 57–67.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dyakov A. V. Michel Foucault and his times. St. Petersburg, Aletejya, 2010. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Криман А. И. Переосмысление основных вопросов философии в контексте постгуманизма // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 7: Философия. 2020. № 4. С. 68–85.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ferrando F. Philosophical Posthumanism. London, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc., 2019.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фуко М. Слова и вещи. Археология гуманитарных наук. СПб.: A-cad, 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foucault M. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. St. Petersburg, A-cad, 1994. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фуко М. Воля к истине. М.: Касталь, 1997.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foucault M. The will to the Truth. Moscow, Kastal', 1997. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Balibar E. Réponse à la question de Jean-Luc Nancy: «qui vient après le sujet?» In: Citoyen sujet et autres essais d'anthropologie philosophique. Presses Universitaires de France, 2011, pp. 35–66.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hassan I. Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Posthumanist Culture? The Georgia Review, 1977, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 830–850.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Braidotti R. The Posthuman. Cambridge, UK, Polity, 2013.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kriman A. I. The Idea of the Posthuman: A Comparative Analysis of Transhumanism and Posthumanism. Filosofskie nauki, 2019, vol. 62 (4), pp. 132–147. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ferrando F. Philosophical Posthumanism. London, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc., 2019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kriman A. I. The Posthuman Turn to the Post(non)human. Voprosy filosofii, 2020, no. 12, pp. 57–67. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hassan I. Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Posthumanist Culture? The Georgia Review, 1977, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 830–850.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kriman A. I. The rethinking of the main issues of philosophy in the context of posthumanism. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Series 7: Philosophy, 2020, no. 4, pp. 68–85. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ranisch R., Sorgner S. L. Introducing Post- and Transhumanism. In: Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang GmbH, 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ranisch R., Sorgner S. L. Introducing Post- and Transhumanism. In: Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang GmbH, 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
