<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sibphil</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сибирский философский журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Siberian Journal of Philosophy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-7517</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Новосибирский государственный университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25205/2541-7517-2020-18-4-145-152</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sibphil-416</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>НАУЧНАЯ ЖИЗНЬ, ПОЛЕМИКА И ДИСКУССИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SCIENTIFIC LIFE, POLEMIC AND DISCUSSIONS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>От позитивизма к научному реализму и социальному конструктивизму: каким должен быть учебник по философии науки. Рецензия на книгу: Klee R. Introduction to the Philosophy of Science: Cutting Nature at Its Seams. Oxford University Press, 1997</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>From Positivism to Scientific Realism and Social Constructivism: What a Textbook on the Philosophy of Science Should Be. Book Review: Klee R. Introduction to the Philosophy of Science: Cutting Nature at Its Seams. Oxford University Press, 1997</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4707-1231</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Головко</surname><given-names>Н. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Golovko</surname><given-names>N. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">golovko@philosophy.nsc.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Новосибирский государственный университет; Институт философии и права СО РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Novosibirsk State University; Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>05</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>145</fpage><lpage>152</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Головко Н.В., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Головко Н.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Golovko N.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/416">https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/416</self-uri><abstract><p>Акцент на том, что философия науки это не всегда философия физики, и использование иммунологии в качестве основного примерадает возможность Роберту Кли весьма ярко продемонстрировать то, что суть введения в предметне только и не столько показать развитие проблемаики в историческом контексте, но и указать на то, что даже фундаментальные допущения и базовые основания могут быть подвергнуты критике. Широкий охват - от формального представления теорий, тезиса Дюгема - Куайна и проблемы объяснения до социального конструктивизма и феминисткой философии науки, вместе с неустанным обоснованием необходимости научного реализма - делает учебник одним из лучших в своем жанре. Размышления о книге: Klee R. Introduction to the Philosophy of Science: Cutting Nature at Its Seams. Oxford University Press, 1997.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The emphasis on the fact that the philosophy of science is not always the philosophy of physics, and the use of immunology as the main example makes it possible for Robert Klee to clearly demonstrate that the essence of introduction is not only and not so much to show the development of problems in a historical context, but to point out to the fact that even the most fundamental assumptions and basic intuitions are not immune to criticism. Wide coverage - from formal presentation of theories, Duhem - Quine thesis and the problem of explanation to social constructivism and the feminist philosophy of science, together with the relentless justification of the need for scientific realism, makesthe textbook one of the best in its genre. Reflections on the book: Klee R. Introduction to the Philosophy of Science: Cutting Nature at Its Seams. Oxford University Press, 1997.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>философия науки</kwd><kwd>позитивизм</kwd><kwd>историцизм</kwd><kwd>научный реализм</kwd><kwd>социальный конструктивизм</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>philosophy of science</kwd><kwd>positivism</kwd><kwd>historicism</kwd><kwd>scientific realism</kwd><kwd>social constructivism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bourdieu P. The Peculiar History of Scientific Reason. Sociological Forum, 1991, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 3-26.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bourdieu P. The Peculiar History of Scientific Reason. Sociological Forum, 1991, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 3-26.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Devitt M. Realism and Truth. Princeton Uni. Press, 1997.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Devitt M. Realism and Truth. Princeton Uni. Press, 1997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Laudan L., Leplin J. Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination. Journal of Philosophy. 1991, vol. 88, p. 449-472.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Laudan L., Leplin J. Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination. Journal of Philosophy. 1991, vol. 88, p. 449-472.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
