<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sibphil</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сибирский философский журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Siberian Journal of Philosophy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-7517</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Новосибирский государственный университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25205/2541-7517-2020-18-2-108-117</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sibphil-355</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОЦИАЛЬНАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Спор о новой исторической стадии: марксизм и концепция постиндустриального общества</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Debate on the New Historical Stage: Marxism and the Concept of Post-Industrial Society</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Трубицын</surname><given-names>О. К.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Trubitsyn</surname><given-names>O. K.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">trubitsyn77@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Новосибирский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Novosibirsk State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>108</fpage><lpage>117</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Трубицын О.К., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Трубицын О.К.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Trubitsyn O.K.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/355">https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/355</self-uri><abstract><p>Марксизм и теория постиндустриального обществадва конкурирующих, но во многом сходных подхода к интерпретации социального развития. Появление гипотезы о переходе на новую, постиндустриальную стадию истории стало вызовом для марксистских теоретиков. Они ответили рядом аргументов, более или менее обоснованных, пытаясь опровергнуть основные положения конкурирующей теории. К настоящему моменту спор еще не окончен. Однако стало ясно, что ключевые положения обеих подходов нуждаются в дополнительном обосновании.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Marxism and the theory of post-industrial society are two competing but largely similar approaches to the interpretation of social development. The emergence of the hypothesis of the transition to a new, post-industrial stage of history was a challenge for Marxist theorists. They responded with a series of arguments, more or less valid, attempting to refute the main tenets of the competing theory. By now, the dispute is not over. However, it became clear that the key points of both approaches needed further justification.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>постмодерн</kwd><kwd>постиндустриальное общество</kwd><kwd>посткапиталистическое общество</kwd><kwd>капитализм</kwd><kwd>классы</kwd><kwd>идеология</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>post-modern</kwd><kwd>post-industrial society</kwd><kwd>post-capitalist society</kwd><kwd>capitalism</kwd><kwd>classes</kwd><kwd>ideology</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
