<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sibphil</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сибирский философский журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Siberian Journal of Philosophy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-7517</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Новосибирский государственный университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25205/2541-7517-2020-18-1-5-15</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sibphil-331</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АНАЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ, ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY, EPISTEMOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Философская онтология и рациональное обоснование: онтологические предпосылки теоретического знания</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Philosophical Ontology and Rational Justification: The Ontological Aspects of Theoretical Knowledge</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Карпович</surname><given-names>В. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Karpovich</surname><given-names>V. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">kkvvnn@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт философии и права СО РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Карпович В.Н., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Карпович В.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Karpovich V.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/331">https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/331</self-uri><abstract><p>Философская онтология представляет собой сложную для определения категорию объектов,вплоть до смешения разных уровней абстракции. В результате возможны различные интерпретации, даже парадоксальные. Современные логические теории, в отличие от традиционной логики, позволяют выявить трудности и наметить способы объяснения различных типов онтологических предпосылок теоретического знания, в том числе философских доктрин.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Philosophical ontology is a difficult to define category of objects, right up to the mixing of different levels of abstraction. As a result, various interpretations are possible, even paradoxical ones. Modern logical theories, unlike traditional logic, make it possible to identify the difficulties and outline ways to explain different types of ontological premises of theoretical knowledge, including philosophical doctrines.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>философская онтология</kwd><kwd>наука</kwd><kwd>теория</kwd><kwd>онтологические обязательства</kwd><kwd>абстракция</kwd><kwd>конкретизация</kwd><kwd>объективность</kwd><kwd>правила</kwd><kwd>форма и содержание</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>philosophical ontology</kwd><kwd>science</kwd><kwd>theory</kwd><kwd>ontological commitments</kwd><kwd>abstraction</kwd><kwd>concretization</kwd><kwd>objectivity</kwd><kwd>rules</kwd><kwd>form and content</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
