<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sibphil</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сибирский философский журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Siberian Journal of Philosophy</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2541-7517</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Новосибирский государственный университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25205/2541-7517-2018-16-4-257-266</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sibphil-169</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЯ ФИЛОСОФИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>КОНЦЕПЦИЯ БЕССТРАСТИЯ БОГА В ДРЕВНЕГРЕЧЕСКОЙ ФИЛОСОФИИ: БЫЛ ЛИ КОНСЕНСУС?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>IMPASSIBILITY OF GOD IN ANCIENT GREEK PHILOSOPHY: WAS THERE A CONSENSUS?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Стрельцов</surname><given-names>А. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Streltsov</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">streltsov@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт философии и права СО РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>10</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>257</fpage><lpage>266</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Стрельцов А.М., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Стрельцов А.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Streltsov A.M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/169">https://sibphil.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/169</self-uri><abstract><p>Рассмотрены представления древнегреческих философов о бесстрастии Бога. Показано, что бесстрастие Бога утверждалось как одно из его свойств в античной философской теологии, даже несмотря на очевидные концептуальные различия между самими философскими школами, причем это представление нельзя свести только к наличию общей критики антропоморфизма богов мифов.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper analyzes views of ancient Greek philosophers concerning impassibility of God. It is demonstrated that impassibility of God has been maintained as one of his main attributes within philosophical theology of antiquity in spite of obvious differences between philosophical schools themselves. One may not reduce this view solely to the common critique of anthropomorphism of gods of mythology.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Бог</kwd><kwd>бесстрастие</kwd><kwd>страсти</kwd><kwd>античная философская теология</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>God</kwd><kwd>impassibility</kwd><kwd>passions</kwd><kwd>ancient philosophical theology</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аристотель. Соч.: В 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1976. Т. 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Аристотель. Соч.: В 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1976. Т. 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Диллон Дж. Средние платоники. 80 г. до н. э. - 220 н. э. СПб.: Изд-во Олега Абышко, Алетейя, 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Диллон Дж. Средние платоники. 80 г. до н. э. - 220 н. э. СПб.: Изд-во Олега Абышко, Алетейя, 2002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Доддс Э. Р. Греки и иррациональное. СПб.: Алетейя, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Доддс Э. Р. Греки и иррациональное. СПб.: Алетейя, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Драч Г. В. Рождение античной философии и начало антропологической проблематики. М.: Гардарики, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Драч Г. В. Рождение античной философии и начало антропологической проблематики. М.: Гардарики, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кессиди Ф. От мифа к логосу: Становление греческой философии. СПб.: Алетейя, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кессиди Ф. От мифа к логосу: Становление греческой философии. СПб.: Алетейя, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Климент Александрийский. Строматы. СПб.: Изд-во Олега Абышко, 2003а. Т. 2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Климент Александрийский. Строматы. СПб.: Изд-во Олега Абышко, 2003а. Т. 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Климент Александрийский. Строматы. СПб.: Изд-во Олега Абышко, 2003б. Т. 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Климент Александрийский. Строматы. СПб.: Изд-во Олега Абышко, 2003б. Т. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лосев А. Ф. Гомер. М.: Молодая гвардия, 2006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Лосев А. Ф. Гомер. М.: Молодая гвардия, 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Платон. Соч.: В 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1993. Т. 2; 1994. Т. 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Платон. Соч.: В 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1993. Т. 2; 1994. Т. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Секст Эмпирик. Соч.: В 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1975. Т. 1; 1976. Т. 2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Секст Эмпирик. Соч.: В 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1975. Т. 1; 1976. Т. 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фрагменты ранних греческих философов. Ч. 1: От эпических теокосмогоний до возникновения атомистики / Под ред. А. В. Лебедева. М.: Наука, 1989.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Фрагменты ранних греческих философов. Ч. 1: От эпических теокосмогоний до возникновения атомистики / Под ред. А. В. Лебедева. М.: Наука, 1989.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фрагменты ранних стоиков / Пер. и коммент. А. Столярова. М.: «Греко-латинский кабинет» Ю. А. Шичалина, 1998. Т. 1; 2007. Т. 3, ч. 1. Эпикур.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Фрагменты ранних стоиков / Пер. и коммент. А. Столярова. М.: «Греко-латинский кабинет» Ю. А. Шичалина, 1998. Т. 1; 2007. Т. 3, ч. 1. Эпикур.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Письмо к Менекею / Пер. и коммент. М. Л. Гаспарова // Тит Лукреций Кар. О природе вещей. М.: Худож. лит., 1983. С. 305-319.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Письмо к Менекею / Пер. и коммент. М. Л. Гаспарова // Тит Лукреций Кар. О природе вещей. М.: Худож. лит., 1983. С. 305-319.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dillon J. M. Metriopatheia and Apatheia: Some Reflections on a Controversy in a Later Greek Ethics / The Golden Chain. Studies in Development of Platonism and Christianity. Variorum, 1990. P. 508-517.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dillon J. M. Metriopatheia and Apatheia: Some Reflections on a Controversy in a Later Greek Ethics / The Golden Chain. Studies in Development of Platonism and Christianity. Variorum, 1990. P. 508-517.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gavrilyuk P. L. The Suffering of the Impassible God: The Dialectics of Patristic Thought. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gavrilyuk P. L. The Suffering of the Impassible God: The Dialectics of Patristic Thought. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glidden D. K. Epicurus on Sense-Perception // American Philosophical Quarterly. 1979. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 297-306.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glidden D. K. Epicurus on Sense-Perception // American Philosophical Quarterly. 1979. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 297-306.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hallman J. M. The Descent of God: Divine Suffering in History and Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hallman J. M. The Descent of God: Divine Suffering in History and Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mourelatos A. P. D. Intrinsic and Relational Properties of Atoms in the Democritean Ontology / Ed. by R. Salles. Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics in Ancient Thought. Themes from the Work of Richard A. Sorabji. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005. P. 37-63.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mourelatos A. P. D. Intrinsic and Relational Properties of Atoms in the Democritean Ontology / Ed. by R. Salles. Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics in Ancient Thought. Themes from the Work of Richard A. Sorabji. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005. P. 37-63.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Usener H. Epicurea. Lipsia: B. G. Teubner, 1887. Watson G. The Problem of the Unchanginng in Greek Philosophy // Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie. 1985. Vol. 27. P. 57-70.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Usener H. Epicurea. Lipsia: B. G. Teubner, 1887. Watson G. The Problem of the Unchanginng in Greek Philosophy // Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie. 1985. Vol. 27. P. 57-70.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
